Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make TESTed the default 'default judge' for repositories #5874

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

jorg-vr
Copy link
Contributor

@jorg-vr jorg-vr commented Oct 17, 2024

This pull request makes TESTed the default judge for repo's
image

@jorg-vr jorg-vr added the enhancement A change that isn't substantial enough to be called a feature label Oct 17, 2024
@jorg-vr jorg-vr self-assigned this Oct 17, 2024
@jorg-vr jorg-vr added the deploy naos Request a deployment on naos label Oct 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the deploy naos Request a deployment on naos label Oct 17, 2024
@jorg-vr jorg-vr marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 14:55
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifying the judge_id column in the repositories table across several files. The default value of the judge_id column has been set to 17, ensuring that new instances of the Repository class will have this value unless specified otherwise. This adjustment is reflected in the model, migration, schema, and factory files, with no other changes to the logic or functionality of the methods.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/models/repository.rb Updated judge_id column to have a default value of 17.
db/migrate/20241017143229_set_default_judge_for_repositories.rb Introduced migration class to set default judge_id to 17.
db/schema.rb Updated schema version and set judge_id default value to 17.
test/factories/repositories.rb Updated judge_id column definition to include a default value of 17.
test/models/repository_test.rb Updated judge_id column definition to include a default value of 17 in the test schema information.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
db/migrate/20241017143229_set_default_judge_for_repositories.rb (1)

3-3: Consider adding a comment to explain the significance of the default value.

The hardcoded value 17 might not be immediately clear to other developers. Consider adding a comment to explain what this value represents (e.g., the ID of the TESTed judge).

Here's a suggested change:

-    change_column_default :repositories, :judge_id, from: nil, to: 17
+    # Set the default judge_id to 17 (TESTed judge)
+    change_column_default :repositories, :judge_id, from: nil, to: 17
test/factories/repositories.rb (3)

9-9: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.

The schema information update correctly reflects the change in the database schema, setting the default judge_id to 17. This aligns with the PR objective of making TESTed the default judge for repositories.

Consider adding a comment to explain what judge_id 17 represents (e.g., TESTed) for better clarity:

-#  judge_id     :integer          default(17)
+#  judge_id     :integer          default(17) # Default to TESTed judge

Line range hint 21-25: Update factory definition to reflect new default behavior

The current factory definition explicitly sets judge to Judge.find(1), which overrides the new default value of 17 set in the schema. To better align with the schema change and accurately represent the new default behavior in tests, consider updating the factory definition.

Here's a suggested change:

 factory :repository do
   name { Faker::Lorem.word + Faker::Number.unique.number(digits: 8).to_s }
   remote { "[email protected]:dodona-edu/#{name}.git" }
-  judge { Judge.find(1) } # load python judge fixture
+  judge { Judge.find(17) } # load TESTed judge fixture (new default)
 end

Alternatively, if you want to keep the ability to easily switch between judges in tests, you could add a trait for the new default:

trait :default_judge do
  judge { Judge.find(17) } # TESTed judge
end

This way, you can use create(:repository) for the old default and create(:repository, :default_judge) for the new default in your tests.


Line range hint 27-37: Consider adding a trait for the new default judge

While the existing traits don't need to be updated, it might be beneficial to add a new trait for testing with the new default judge. This would provide more flexibility in tests and make it easier to create repositories with the new default judge.

Consider adding the following trait:

trait :default_judge do
  judge { Judge.find(17) } # TESTed judge (new default)
end

This would allow you to easily create repositories with the new default judge in your tests:

create(:repository, :default_judge)

It also maintains backwards compatibility, allowing you to still create repositories with the old default judge when needed:

create(:repository) # Uses Judge.find(1) as before
app/models/repository.rb (1)

Line range hint 227-227: Clarify judge fallback behavior in process_activities method

In the process_activities method, when updating an exercise, there's a fallback to judge if no judge is specified in the config:

act.judge = j || judge

With the new default judge_id, it's worth clarifying if this fallback should:

  1. Remain as is (falling back to the repository's judge)
  2. Use the new default judge (id: 17)
  3. Be removed, allowing the default to be set at the database level

Consider updating this line to explicitly use the default judge if that's the intended behavior:

act.judge = j || judge || Judge.find_by(id: 17)

Alternatively, if the current behavior is intentional, consider adding a comment explaining why it doesn't use the default judge.

test/models/repository_test.rb (2)

9-9: LGTM. Consider adding a test for the default judge.

The change to set a default value of 17 for judge_id aligns with the PR objective to make TESTed the default judge for repositories. This modification ensures that new Repository instances will have TESTed as their default judge unless specified otherwise.

Consider adding a test case to verify that new Repository instances are created with the default judge (TESTed) when no judge is explicitly specified. This will help ensure the new default behavior is working as expected. Here's a suggested test case:

test 'should use TESTed as default judge when creating a new repository' do
  repository = create :repository, :git_stubbed
  assert_equal 17, repository.judge_id, "Expected new repository to have TESTed (judge_id: 17) as the default judge"
end

Line range hint 1-531: Consider updating existing tests to account for the new default judge.

While the schema change doesn't break any existing tests, it introduces a new default behavior that isn't explicitly tested. To ensure robustness and prevent potential issues in the future, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Update tests that rely on a specific judge to explicitly set the judge, ensuring they're not accidentally using the new default.
  2. Add assertions in relevant tests to verify that the correct judge is being used, especially in scenarios where the judge isn't explicitly set.

Here's an example of how you might update an existing test:

test 'should process correctly' do
  # Existing setup code...
  
  # Explicitly set the judge to ensure the test isn't relying on the default
  @repository.update(judge: @python)
  
  # Existing assertions...
  
  # Add an assertion to verify the correct judge is being used
  assert_equal @python, @repository.judge, "Expected repository to use the explicitly set judge"
end

These updates will help ensure that the tests remain accurate and effective with the new default judge behavior.

db/schema.rb (1)

13-13: Minor style improvements suggested by static analysis.

Consider the following style improvements:

  1. Use underscores as thousands separators in the schema version number for better readability.
  2. Use single quotes for the string literal in the judge_id default value assignment.

These are minor style suggestions and don't affect functionality.

Here's how you could apply these changes:

-ActiveRecord::Schema[7.2].define(version: 2024_10_17_143229) do
+ActiveRecord::Schema[7.2].define(version: 2024_10_17_143_229) do
   # ...
-    t.integer "judge_id", default: 17
+    t.integer 'judge_id', default: 17
   # ...

Also applies to: 393-393

🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop

[convention] 13-13: Use underscores(_) as thousands separator and separate every 3 digits with them.

(Style/NumericLiterals)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c24eded and 978fd31.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • app/models/repository.rb (1 hunks)
  • db/migrate/20241017143229_set_default_judge_for_repositories.rb (1 hunks)
  • db/schema.rb (2 hunks)
  • test/factories/repositories.rb (1 hunks)
  • test/models/repository_test.rb (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 rubocop
db/schema.rb

[convention] 13-13: Use underscores(_) as thousands separator and separate every 3 digits with them.

(Style/NumericLiterals)


[convention] 393-393: Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols.

(Style/StringLiterals)

🔇 Additional comments (8)
db/migrate/20241017143229_set_default_judge_for_repositories.rb (2)

1-5: LGTM! The migration is well-structured and follows Rails best practices.

The migration is correctly implemented:

  • It uses the change method for automatic reversibility.
  • It specifies both from and to values in change_column_default, which is good for explicit reversibility.
  • The class name and file naming follow Rails conventions.

1-5: Verify alignment with PR objectives and consider potential impacts.

This change aligns with the PR objective of making TESTed the default 'default judge' for repositories. However, we should consider the following:

  1. Existing repositories: This migration only affects the default value for new records. Existing repositories with nil judge_id will not be updated.
  2. Application logic: Ensure that any code relying on nil judge_id values is updated accordingly.
  3. Reversibility: While the migration is reversible, consider if there are any implications of reverting this change after it has been in production.

To help verify the impact, you can run the following script:

This script will help identify any potential areas that might need attention due to this change.

app/models/repository.rb (3)

Line range hint 1-334: Summary of Repository model changes

The change to set a default judge_id of 17 for the repositories table is a significant update that aligns with the PR objective. While the change itself is straightforward, it has potential implications across the model and possibly the wider application. Here are the key points and recommendations:

  1. The schema change looks good and is approved.
  2. Verify that a corresponding migration exists and is correct.
  3. Check for any code that might rely on the absence of a default judge_id.
  4. Ensure tests are updated to account for this new default value, particularly for repository creation and judge changes.
  5. Verify the behavior of the after_save callback process_activities_email_errors_delayed with the new default value.
  6. Clarify the intention of the judge fallback in the process_activities method and update if necessary.

These steps will help ensure that the change is properly implemented and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.

To assist with these verifications, I've provided shell commands in the previous comments. Please review the results of these commands and make any necessary adjustments to the code or tests.


Line range hint 35-35: Verify behavior of after_save callback with new default judge_id

The after_save callback process_activities_email_errors_delayed is triggered when judge_id changes. With the new default value, it's important to ensure this callback behaves correctly for new repositories and when explicitly setting the judge.

Please verify the following scenarios:

  1. Creating a new repository without specifying a judge
  2. Creating a new repository with an explicitly set judge
  3. Changing the judge of an existing repository

You may want to add or update tests to cover these scenarios:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing tests related to repository creation and judge changes
rg --type ruby 'describe.*Repository.*judge' spec

9-9: LGTM. Verify migration and potential impacts.

The change to set a default value of 17 for the judge_id column aligns with the PR objective to make TESTed the default judge for repositories. This is a good improvement for consistency.

To ensure this change is properly implemented and doesn't have unintended consequences:

  1. Verify that a corresponding migration exists:

  2. Check for any code that might rely on the absence of a default judge_id:

  3. Ensure tests are updated to account for this new default value:

test/models/repository_test.rb (1)

Line range hint 1-531: Summary: Approve with suggestions for test improvements

The change to set TESTed as the default judge for repositories is straightforward and doesn't introduce any breaking changes to the existing test suite. However, to ensure comprehensive coverage and maintain the robustness of the test suite, consider implementing the following improvements:

  1. Add a new test case to explicitly verify the default judge behavior for new repositories.
  2. Update relevant existing tests to ensure they're not implicitly relying on the old default behavior.
  3. Add assertions in appropriate tests to verify that the correct judge is being used, especially in scenarios where the judge isn't explicitly set.

These improvements will help ensure that the new default behavior is working as expected and that future changes don't inadvertently break this functionality.

db/schema.rb (2)

13-13: Schema version updated.

The schema version has been updated from 2024_09_11_085152 to 2024_10_17_143229, which is expected when modifying the database schema.

🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop

[convention] 13-13: Use underscores(_) as thousands separator and separate every 3 digits with them.

(Style/NumericLiterals)


393-393: LGTM! Verify the impact of the default judge change.

The change to set the default judge_id to 17 for repositories aligns with the PR objective to make TESTed the default 'default judge'. This change looks good and should achieve the desired outcome.

To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please run the following verification script:

This script will help identify any hardcoded judge_id values that might need updating and confirm that judge ID 17 indeed corresponds to TESTed.

🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop

[convention] 393-393: Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols.

(Style/StringLiterals)

@pdawyndt pdawyndt changed the title Make TESTed the defaul 'default judge' for repositories Make TESTed the default 'default judge' for repositories Oct 17, 2024
@jorg-vr jorg-vr merged commit 76f5ab3 into main Oct 18, 2024
17 checks passed
@jorg-vr jorg-vr deleted the fix/default-judge branch October 18, 2024 07:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement A change that isn't substantial enough to be called a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants