Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust code fix wording in all MSTest analyzer docs #43791

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Youssef1313
Copy link
Member

@Youssef1313 Youssef1313 commented Nov 28, 2024

Fixes #43785


Internal previews

Toggle expand/collapse
📄 File 🔗 Preview link
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0001.md MSTEST0001: Explicitly enable or disable tests parallelization
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0002.md "MSTEST0002: Test classes should have valid layout"
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0003.md MSTEST0003: Test methods should have valid layout
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0004.md docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0004
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0005.md MSTEST0005: Test context property should have valid layout
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0006.md "MSTEST0006: Avoid '[ExpectedException]'"
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0007.md MSTEST0007: Use test attributes only on test methods
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0008.md docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0008
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0009.md MSTEST0009: TestCleanup method should have valid layout
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0010.md "MSTEST0010: ClassInitialize method should have valid layout"
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0011.md MSTEST0011: ClassCleanup method should have valid layout
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0012.md docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0012
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0013.md MSTEST0013: AssemblyCleanup method should have valid layout
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0014.md "MSTEST0014: DataRow should be valid"
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0015.md MSTEST0015: Test method should not be ignored
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0016.md docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0016
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0017.md MSTEST0017: Assertion arguments should be passed in the correct order
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0019.md "MSTEST0019: Prefer TestInitialize methods over constructors"
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0020.md MSTEST0020: Prefer constructors over TestInitialize methods
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0021.md docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0021
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0022.md MSTEST0022: Prefer TestCleanup over Dispose methods
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0023.md "MSTEST0023: Do not negate boolean assertions"
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0024.md MSTEST0024: Do not store TestContext in a static member
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0025.md docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0025
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0026.md MSTEST0026: Avoid conditional access in assertions
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0029.md "MSTEST0029: Public method should be test method"
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0030.md MSTEST0030: Type containing [TestMethod] should be marked with [TestClass]
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0031.md docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0031
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0032.md MSTEST0032: Review or remove the assertion as its condition is known to be always true.
docs/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/mstest0034.md "MSTEST0034: Use ClassCleanupBehavior.EndOfClass with the [ClassCleanup]."

Note

This table shows preview links for the 30 files with the most changes. For preview links for other files in this PR, select OpenPublishing.Build Details within checks.

@Youssef1313 Youssef1313 requested review from IEvangelist and a team as code owners November 28, 2024 06:06
@dotnetrepoman dotnetrepoman bot added this to the November 2024 milestone Nov 28, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the community-contribution Indicates PR is created by someone from the .NET community. label Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community-contribution Indicates PR is created by someone from the .NET community. dotnet-fundamentals/svc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Revise the "There is a code fix" wording used in all MSTest analyzer docs
1 participant