Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add standard implicit array-to-Span conversions #73577
Add standard implicit array-to-Span conversions #73577
Changes from 4 commits
5595cbd
a9556fa
9c77d67
bf5d04a
d77d923
937ef86
e0a3d28
05ffb16
e511947
4beeb16
3c9311b
3f45704
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this is actually true? Won't we need to store the method symbol of the conversion on the conversion object? #Resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That doesn't seem necessary, we can find the method during lowering. It's the same thing InlineArray conversion does. I think the difference between trivial conversions like ImplicitSpan/InlineArray and complex conversions that need a method symbol like user-defined conversions is that the latter need to do a more complex lookup to find the method symbol whereas the former just obtain a well-known member.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not a matter of when we can find the method, the question is the impact to our public API; namely, will we expose the method symbol we look up in
Conversion.MethodSymbol
or not. I'm currently a bit torn; given that I think we will likely spec which methods the compiler calls for each conversion, it seems like we should include that method in the conversion. On the other hand, it may be that we need to have multiple methods (Span<string>
->ReadOnlySpan<object>
, for example, will probably need to go toReadOnlySpan<string>
in between), and that dual method becomes more complicated to represent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, that sounds like a question for API review.
The docs of
Conversion.MethodSymbol
currently state that it's set only for user-defined and method group conversions. And indeed, for example, InlineArray conversion also does not expose the MethodSymbol.There are other places that seem to rely on the fact that
Conversion.MethodSymbol
is set only for user-defined and method group conversions, e.g.,Binder.ReportDiagnosticsIfObsolete
- we report obsolete diagnostics only for user-defined methods and not built-in conversions.Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.