Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test case for analyzer dependency loading #75487

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jaredpar
Copy link
Member

Teams were asking about whether or not the compiler will handle multiple analyzers taking a dependency on the same utility DLL at different versions (when it's strong named). This adds a test that goes through that scenario to validate it will work.

Teams were asking about whether or not the compiler will handle multiple
analyzers taking a dependency on the same utility DLL at different
versions (when it's strong named). This adds a test that goes through
that scenario to validate it will work.
@jaredpar jaredpar requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2024 20:58
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added Area-Compilers untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead labels Oct 11, 2024
@jaredpar
Copy link
Member Author

@RikkiGibson, @dotnet/roslyn-compiler PTAL

@RikkiGibson RikkiGibson self-assigned this Oct 11, 2024
sb.AppendLine(""Delta.2: "" + s);
}

public void M2()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the only real change in here is that 'M1' and 'M2' were added, right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-Compilers untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants