Remove a lock contention test #108155
Merged
Remove a lock contention test #108155
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Followup to dotnet#108135. The test seems to be failing occasionally, it doesn't seem to be reliable, as other components that are involved can contend on locks aside from lock contention the test is looking for.
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9 |
eduardo-vp
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2024
sirntar
pushed a commit
to sirntar/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
Followup to dotnet#108135. The test seems to be failing occasionally, it doesn't seem to be reliable, as other components that are involved can contend on locks aside from lock contention the test is looking for.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Followup to #108135. The test seems to be failing occasionally, it doesn't seem to be reliable, as other components that are involved can contend on locks aside from lock contention the test is looking for. It doesn't seem like the test would be super useful to run regularly either.