Replace DAMT.All with more restricted annotation on InvokeMember/FindMembers/DeclaredMembers

[MichalStrehovsky]

I'm looking at places we use .All to see if the new annotations could help. Here we don't need the new annotations, this was always expressible. I can only assume the reason for .All was laziness. This was at a time when we believed .All "just keeps a bit more" and we didn't consider the impact of marking interface methods implemented by the class, or the impact of warnings due to .All capturing things that are not safe to reflection-call.

This is a breaking change in theory, should someone implement IReflect or derive from System.TypeInfo - they need to update the annotations.

Cc @dotnet/illink @eerhardt

[dotnet-issue-labeler]

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

[dotnet-issue-labeler]

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

[dotnet-policy-service]

Tagging subscribers to 'linkable-framework': @eerhardt, @vitek-karas, @LakshanF, @sbomer, @joperezr, @marek-safar
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

[MichalStrehovsky]

@dotnet/illink @eerhardt anyone could have a look please?

[sbomer]

LGTM. I think the breaking change is acceptable - should be rare for anyone to hit this, and if they do, fixing the annotations to match this would be an improvement.

[MichalStrehovsky]

/ba-g deadlettered test