Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating a new repo - minimum expectations #29

Closed
5 tasks done
iteles opened this issue Oct 18, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

Creating a new repo - minimum expectations #29

iteles opened this issue Oct 18, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@iteles
Copy link
Member

iteles commented Oct 18, 2016

We have a lot here on how things operate during a project, but as @mk4111 pointed out here, not much about how to start a repo.

We need to add in the key points around this soon!

@iteles
Copy link
Member Author

iteles commented Jan 15, 2017

Linked to #27

@naazy
Copy link
Member

naazy commented Feb 22, 2017

Agreed! I don't think the rules for creating a repo are clear e.g. who can create it/what warrants the creation of a new repo (e.g. does it have to be led by demand etc).

@mk4111
Copy link
Member

mk4111 commented Mar 8, 2017

Hi @iteles! Wondering if dwyl/start-here repo would be a good place to mention this? We could maybe have a list of 'common FAQs' that we could check out; we could use it to point users to another repo ( e.g. Q: 'How can I find out more about contributing?' A: 'Go to https://github.com/dwyl/contributing !') and/or answer some general questions ( e.g. Q: 'Where can I ask a generic question?' A: 'Post it as an issue on this repo!' )?

I know it's a little different, but this was suggested for #71 (comment) too, so thought it could maaybe apply for this issue too!

@iteles
Copy link
Member Author

iteles commented Mar 10, 2017

@mk4111 Please do go ahead and PR this into start-here if you have the chance - two issues, one stone ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants