Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Riak backend for private storage #445

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 21, 2015
Merged

Riak backend for private storage #445

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 21, 2015

Conversation

michalwski
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mongoose-im
Copy link
Collaborator

travis is using test branch riak-private from https://github.com/esl/ejabberd_tests/tree/riak-private

2 similar comments
@mongoose-im
Copy link
Collaborator

travis is using test branch riak-private from https://github.com/esl/ejabberd_tests/tree/riak-private

@mongoose-im
Copy link
Collaborator

travis is using test branch riak-private from https://github.com/esl/ejabberd_tests/tree/riak-private

@@ -30,9 +30,11 @@
-export([update_type/3, update_type/4]).
-export([fetch_type/2, fetch_type/3]).
-export([list_keys/1]).
-export([list_buckets/1]).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is list_buckets used somewhere? Shall I remove it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a helper function I used while developing. I left it because I found it useful.

ppikula added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2015
Riak backend for private storage
@ppikula ppikula merged commit ac9ff99 into master Aug 21, 2015
@ppikula ppikula deleted the riak-private branch September 11, 2015 16:13
@michalwski michalwski mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants