-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Py: system.part.pairs() is wrong #4622
Milestone
Comments
I'll fix that. |
This bug was introduced in the 4.2.0 release. |
kodiakhq bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2022
Fixes #4622 Description of changes: - the `System.part.pairs()` method now returns the correct particle pairs when particle ids aren't both contiguous and starting from 0
jngrad
pushed a commit
to jngrad/espresso
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2022
Fixes espressomd#4622 Description of changes: - the `System.part.pairs()` method now returns the correct particle pairs when particle ids aren't both contiguous and starting from 0
jngrad
pushed a commit
to jngrad/espresso
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2022
Fixes espressomd#4622 Description of changes: - the `System.part.pairs()` method now returns the correct particle pairs when particle ids aren't both contiguous and starting from 0
jngrad
pushed a commit
to jngrad/espresso
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2022
Fixes espressomd#4622 Description of changes: - the `System.part.pairs()` method now returns the correct particle pairs when particle ids aren't both contiguous and starting from 0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
if the particle numbering is not consecuitve (contains holes), this misses pairs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: