Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add special requirement in EIP-1 for mentioning EVM instructions #1968

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2019

Conversation

axic
Copy link
Member

@axic axic commented Apr 26, 2019

No description provided.

@axic axic mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2019
@axic
Copy link
Member Author

axic commented Apr 30, 2019

@axic axic changed the title Add special requirement for mentioning EVM instructions Add special requirement in EIP-1 for mentioning EVM instructions Apr 30, 2019
@nicksavers
Copy link
Contributor

This is pretty specific, but sure it seems like the obvious thing. Are there any EIP (Draft or Final) that currently don't meet this requirement?

@axic
Copy link
Member Author

axic commented Apr 30, 2019

There area lot. At point started to fix them and ended up with a few hundred lines of changes, but never finished it. I can push the branch separately, but wouldn't pollute this PR.

EIPS/eip-1.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@axic axic added the meta label May 10, 2019
@axic
Copy link
Member Author

axic commented May 21, 2019

@nicksavers pushed here a branch (https://github.com/axic/EIPs/tree/eip1-opcodes-updates) which fixes it for many files (but not all).

@axic
Copy link
Member Author

axic commented May 29, 2019

@nicksavers @Arachnid can we merge this?

@gcolvin gcolvin merged commit 63a04a1 into ethereum:master Jun 12, 2019
@axic axic deleted the eip1-opcodes branch June 12, 2019 15:30
@axic axic mentioned this pull request Aug 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants