-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update ERC-5521: Move to Last Call #309
Conversation
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
The commit 3525d94 (as a parent of 7a5255f) contains errors. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great overall! My only complaint is that your rationale section doesn't really explain choices you made within the proposal itself. Instead, you're justifying the EIP as a whole.
The rationale section should explain why, for example, UpdateNode
indexes some of its arguments and not all of them.
My analogy for the difference between Motivation and Rationale is:
Motivation: Why do we need to build a shed?
Rationale: Why did I paint the shed red?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
aggreement
-> agreement
Response to comments from reviewers
Thanks for that @SamWilsn We've fixed this and more grammar errors and typos. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
Discussion on https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-5521-erc-721-referable-nft/10310.
Updated on 17 Apr: The method
createdTimestampOf
has been added to the interface to specifically emphasize the necessity of setting thecreatedTimestamp
for each rNFT. This addition is not about implementation details but is a part of the specification.Updated on 23 Apr: Fixed the grammar errors and typos.