Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename get_safe_execution_payload_hash -> *_block_hash #3595

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

etan-status
Copy link
Contributor

The name get_safe_execution_payload_hash is misleading, as it returns the execution block hash. There is no concept of a payload hash. Rename the function, and also update some documentation for clarity.

The name `get_safe_execution_payload_hash` is misleading, as it returns
the execution block hash. There is no concept of a payload hash. Rename
the function, and also update some documentation for clarity.
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkalinin mkalinin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is more on the aesthetical side of things to me. I am not opposed to but would like to get one more approval before merging it

@hwwhww hwwhww added the general:presentation Presentation (as opposed to content) label Feb 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jtraglia jtraglia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. This should be block hash. Thanks!

@mkalinin mkalinin merged commit 10becc5 into ethereum:dev Aug 2, 2024
30 checks passed
@etan-status etan-status deleted the bf-safehash branch August 5, 2024 10:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
general:presentation Presentation (as opposed to content)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants