Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EIP-2929: Gas cost increases for state access opcodes + YoloV2 #21509
EIP-2929: Gas cost increases for state access opcodes + YoloV2 #21509
Changes from 1 commit
d990f93
6a45194
551be8e
e4cd150
f66f4e5
9cb1204
014f98d
032e673
d8bf9ea
e429b73
a31b156
2e177d5
0efc69a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMHO this
map
+slice
combo makes things more complicated than they should be. Wouldn't using amap[common.Address]map[common.Hash]struct{}
be simpler? Yes, it looks a bit unwieldy, but code handling wise IMHO almost all the code below could be simplified.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if the
bool
has any meaning other than "present". If only that,struct{}
is better because it doesn't use any memory to store an extratrue
value.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it would be easier. I was just trying to keep the memory down. I can change it if you prefer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd still have made it even smaller :))
That would have avoided the need for the
-1
index special marker.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Myeah, map-in-a-map would let you get rid of this
-1
magic number.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you totally sure it's worth the extra memory space to have map-in-a-map? I''ll change it if you confirm that's what we want