WeiToGwei in withdrawals #1147
Merged
WeiToGwei in withdrawals #1147
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yperbasis
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2023
yperbasis
added a commit
to erigontech/erigon
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
refilling withdrawals Shanghai fork tests with this branch
https://github.com/MariusVanDerWijden/go-ethereum/tree/wei-to-gwei
the downside here is that we put Shanghai keyword in the tests already.
while Shanghai eips inclusion is undefined. it is better to stick to Merge+xxxx notation since
versions of Shanghai are different depending on geth branch
@gumb0
I can't regenerate the rest of stEOF tests with this wei-to-gwei rules