Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tx package backwards-compatibility test vs. EIP2718/2930 #1135

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cgewecke
Copy link
Contributor

@cgewecke cgewecke commented Mar 4, 2021

Just a test...

#1118 running against #1048

@cgewecke cgewecke changed the title Add tx package backwards-compatibility test (vs. EIP2718/2930) Tx package backwards-compatibility test vs. EIP2718/2930 Mar 4, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1135 (05d04b6) into eip2718-eip2930 (9c6f2f6) will increase coverage by 1.47%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

Flag Coverage Δ
block 81.61% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
blockchain 84.13% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
client 87.04% <ø> (?)
common 87.87% <ø> (+0.63%) ⬆️
devp2p 84.49% <ø> (+0.31%) ⬆️
ethash 82.08% <ø> (ø)
tx 85.50% <ø> (-0.17%) ⬇️
vm ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@cgewecke
Copy link
Contributor Author

cgewecke commented Mar 4, 2021

Somethings not right here ... maybe w/ cache-ing in CI? Will try without a rebase.

@cgewecke cgewecke closed this Mar 4, 2021
@cgewecke cgewecke deleted the tx-compat-test-eip2718 branch March 4, 2021 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant