docs(v2): fix Java syntax highlight in website #4849
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Josh-Cena <[email protected]>
|
[V2] Built without sensitive environment variables with commit 70e7d20 |
|
⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:
Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-4849--docusaurus-2.netlify.app/ |
Josh-Cena
changed the title
lex111
approved these changes
May 25, 2021
|
@Josh-Cena we probably didn't notice this as this is "just example of tabs", so it's good that you paid attention to this, thanks. |
lex111
changed the title
lex111
added
documentation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
The Java syntax highlight is finally broken in docusaurus.io. (Weird I say finally here, but no-one had any idea why it worked before.) Now is good time to add
javatoadditionalLanguagesand make the site consistent with our documentation.Fix #4845.
Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on pull requests?
Yea