Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for network version 18 (FEVM) #1140

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Mar 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

frrist
Copy link
Member

@frrist frrist commented Feb 22, 2023

This PR supports NV18 by pulling in the latest lotus release candidate. The version of the lotus release candidate will continue to be updated in this branch until a final release from lotus is tagged ie. v1.20.0

This branch has commits cherry-picked from ntwk/hyperspacenet to facilitate required state inspection.

@frrist
Copy link
Member Author

frrist commented Feb 22, 2023

What's left:

  • We need to add a codec to the actor events schema: df735c2

frrist and others added 14 commits March 3, 2023 15:53
- clean up types, remove lily actors types, replace with go-state-types
* feat: implement actor event task and schema

- track the value of EventRoots contained in message receipts.
- create a table that records raw message parameters
- it handles the case of legacy events
- use github.com/ipfs/go-libipfs/blocks instead
* feat: track verified registry actor claim HAMT changes

- addresses request made here: https://github.com/protocol/pldw/issues/177#issuecomment-1372920524
* fix: correctly diff new actor version

- closes #1144

* chore: remove unused metrics

* metric: track GettActorStateChanges duration
Copy link
Contributor

@birdychang birdychang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested in staging environment.

@birdychang birdychang merged commit 345a6ab into master Mar 8, 2023
@birdychang birdychang deleted the frrist/nv18-rc1 branch March 8, 2023 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants