Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: stmgr: check message validity before invoking vm #10259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

Stebalien
Copy link
Member

Proposed Changes

Otherwise we may, e.g., try to estimate gas on a message to an f4 address before the nv18 migration.

I'm not checking the "prior messages" here as this is just a sanity check.

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

Otherwise we may, e.g., try to estimate gas on a message to an f4
address before the nv18 migration.

I'm _not_ checking the "prior messages" here as this is just a sanity
check.
@Stebalien Stebalien requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2023 19:08
@Stebalien Stebalien requested review from arajasek and magik6k and removed request for arajasek February 14, 2023 01:34
Copy link
Contributor

@arajasek arajasek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems kinda unnecessary, but no opposition to this.

@arajasek arajasek merged commit 3c4a839 into release/v1.20.0 Feb 14, 2023
@arajasek arajasek deleted the steb/call-check-message-validity branch February 14, 2023 02:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants