Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: Use abi.MethodNum instead of uint64 for method nums #9861

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2022

Conversation

geoff-vball
Copy link
Contributor

Related Issues

Proposed Changes

Integrates filecoin-project/go-state-types#133

Makes method metadata much cleaner :)

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

@geoff-vball geoff-vball requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2022 16:50
@geoff-vball geoff-vball force-pushed the gstuart/use-method-num-for-method-nums branch 2 times, most recently from 0db408b to b23c97d Compare December 13, 2022 17:11
@geoff-vball geoff-vball force-pushed the gstuart/use-method-num-for-method-nums branch from b23c97d to e1926a0 Compare December 13, 2022 17:29
@geoff-vball geoff-vball merged commit f3830b6 into master Dec 13, 2022
@geoff-vball geoff-vball deleted the gstuart/use-method-num-for-method-nums branch December 13, 2022 18:03
@jennijuju jennijuju added this to the Network v18 milestone Feb 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants