Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ecosystem to node spec and tie flows into core.json #660

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

LeighFinegold
Copy link
Member

This PR addresses the feature request detailed in issue 650 by implementing the following enhancements to CALM

  1. Adds ecosystem definition to node-type
  2. Add flows to core.json. This will allow the eventual traversal of calm-hub by calm-docify
  3. It additionally contains some small changes to $id and $url references with the intention that these documents will be hosted network addressable and in calm-hub

@LeighFinegold LeighFinegold requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2024 11:50
@LeighFinegold LeighFinegold force-pushed the calm-docify branch 2 times, most recently from 3b34098 to 9a50a98 Compare December 9, 2024 12:02
@rocketstack-matt
Copy link
Member

I know this isn't added in this PR, but I do think we should break out the way controls are modelled here, each control should be a separate document rather than all bundled, but happy to discuss that in a separate PR.

@@ -175,6 +181,7 @@
"node-type-definition": {
"enum": [
"actor",
"ecosystem",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what this is for? Will continue looking through the review.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Explained on linked issue. If we don't want to pull over that terminology, happy to go with something else

@LeighFinegold LeighFinegold merged commit 0e655af into finos:main Dec 11, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants