-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using new offloaded metadata literal message for literal offloading #5705
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5705 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.18% 36.16% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 1302 1302
Lines 109614 109653 +39
==========================================
+ Hits 39660 39661 +1
- Misses 65809 65847 +38
Partials 4145 4145
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM but would be good to get @eapolinario 's review
Signed-off-by: pmahindrakar-oss <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pmahindrakar-oss <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pmahindrakar-oss <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pmahindrakar-oss <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pmahindrakar-oss <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pmahindrakar-oss <[email protected]>
5ac8266
to
8de47b1
Compare
…lyteorg#5705) Signed-off-by: Bugra Gedik <[email protected]>
Tracking issue
RFC #5103
Why are the changes needed?
Without these changes we hit grpc limit when propeller tries to create an execution by passing inputs inline which it got from output of large map task
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding a new sub message for offloaded literal which would be populated initially by propeller for map task user when the collected values are greater than configured threshold and later flytekit which write the o/p where we will be adding similar checks
How was this patch tested?
Will be tested as part of this PR #5697
These are just IDL changes
Setup process
Screenshots
Check all the applicable boxes
Related PRs
Docs link