Fix custom gpu resource name specification

[jeevb]

Tracking issue

Why are the changes needed?

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

How was this patch tested?

Setup process

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

• I updated the documentation accordingly.
• All new and existing tests passed.
• All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

Summary by Bito

Implementation of configurable GPU resource names in Kubernetes configurations, replacing hardcoded NVIDIA GPU resource names. The changes focus on resource conversion utilities in the Kubernetes plugin machinery, with comprehensive test coverage added. The PR also includes Makefile improvements for development workflow enhancement.

Unit tests added: True

Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 1

[flyte-bot]

Code Review Agent Run #d4de8b

Actionable Suggestions - 0

Review Details

• Files reviewed - 3 · Commit Range: cb764ad..cb764ad

  • Makefile
  • flyteplugins/go/tasks/pluginmachinery/flytek8s/utils.go
  • flyteplugins/go/tasks/pluginmachinery/flytek8s/utils_test.go
• Files skipped - 0
• Tools

  • Golangci-lint (Linter) - ✖︎ Failed
  • Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
  • Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
  • GOVULNCHECK (Security Vulnerability) - ✖︎ Failed
  • SNYK (Security Vulnerability) - ✔︎ Successful
  • OWASP (Security Vulnerability) - ✔︎ Successful

---

AI Code Review powered by

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.01%. Comparing base (61838b4) to head (cb764ad).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6129   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.01%   37.01%           
=======================================
  Files        1318     1318           
  Lines      132525   132526    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        49052    49055    +3     
+ Misses      79228    79226    -2     
  Partials     4245     4245           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog	51.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin	54.25% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
unittests-flytecopilot	30.99% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytectl	62.29% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests-flyteidl	7.23% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteplugins	53.86% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests-flytepropeller	42.59% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytestdlib	55.18% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[flyte-bot]

Changelist by Bito

This pull request implements the following key changes.

Key Change	Files Impacted
Feature Improvement - GPU Resource Name Configuration Enhancement	- utils.go - Modified GPU resource name to be configurable instead of hardcoded - utils_test.go - Added test cases for custom GPU resource name configuration
Other Improvements - Development Workflow Enhancement	- Makefile - Added run target for local development with single binary configuration