Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ref(quick-start): Remove 'USER_CONTEXT' from onboarding tasks #83489

Conversation

priscilawebdev
Copy link
Member

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Jan 15, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #83489      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.53%   87.53%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        9406     9406              
  Lines      537327   537306      -21     
  Branches    21156    21156              
==========================================
- Hits       470339   470307      -32     
- Misses      66643    66654      +11     
  Partials      345      345              

Copy link
Member

@shellmayr shellmayr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@priscilawebdev priscilawebdev merged commit 2fedca3 into master Jan 15, 2025
48 checks passed
@priscilawebdev priscilawebdev deleted the priscila/ref/quick-start/remove-user-context-onboarding-tasks branch January 15, 2025 12:59
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants