Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Account for existing but empty cpus file #2151

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Note that the only difference between `v2` and `v3` of the CodeQL Action is the

## [UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.
- Fix an issue where an existing, but empty, `/sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset.cpus` file always resulted in a single-threaded run. [#2151](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/pull/2151)

## 3.24.3 - 15 Feb 2024

Expand Down
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions lib/util.js

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion lib/util.js.map

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions lib/util.test.js

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion lib/util.test.js.map

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

33 changes: 33 additions & 0 deletions src/util.test.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -449,3 +449,36 @@ for (const [
versionStub.restore();
});
}

test("getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus calculates the number of CPUs correctly", async (t) => {
await util.withTmpDir(async (tmpDir: string) => {
const testCpuFile = `${tmpDir}/cpus-file`;
fs.writeFileSync(testCpuFile, "1, 9-10\n", "utf-8");
t.deepEqual(
util.getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus(testCpuFile, getRunnerLogger(true)),
3,
);
});
});

test("getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus returns undefined if the CPU file doesn't exist", async (t) => {
await util.withTmpDir(async (tmpDir: string) => {
const testCpuFile = `${tmpDir}/cpus-file`;
t.false(fs.existsSync(testCpuFile));
t.deepEqual(
util.getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus(testCpuFile, getRunnerLogger(true)),
undefined,
);
});
});

test("getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus returns undefined if the CPU file exists but is empty", async (t) => {
await util.withTmpDir(async (tmpDir: string) => {
const testCpuFile = `${tmpDir}/cpus-file`;
fs.writeFileSync(testCpuFile, "\n", "utf-8");
t.deepEqual(
util.getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus(testCpuFile, getRunnerLogger(true)),
undefined,
);
});
});
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions src/util.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ function getCgroupCpuCountFromCpuMax(
/**
* Gets the number of available cores listed in the cgroup cpuset.cpus file at the given path.
*/
function getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus(
export function getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus(
cpusFile: string,
logger: Logger,
): number | undefined {
Expand All @@ -453,7 +453,10 @@ function getCgroupCpuCountFromCpus(

let cpuCount = 0;
// Comma-separated numbers and ranges, for eg. 0-1,3
const cpusString = fs.readFileSync(cpusFile, "utf-8");
const cpusString = fs.readFileSync(cpusFile, "utf-8").trim();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is that if the file is empty, we'll return 0, but I think we probably want to return undefined?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That could work too — we're filtering out all counts that are undefined, or <= 0, so they kind of have the same meaning. But I don't mind making it return undefined if that's more clear.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that's good that we were already filtering out <=0. I think I'd find undefined slightly more clear, but it's not critical.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The updated logic returns undefined 😄

if (cpusString.length === 0) {
return undefined;
}
for (const token of cpusString.split(",")) {
if (!token.includes("-")) {
// Not a range
Expand Down
Loading