Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mergeback v1.0.2 aeisenberg/pack-run into main #559

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2021

Updates version and changelog.

aeisenberg and others added 15 commits June 3, 2021 15:46
This commit adds a `packs` option to the codeql-config.yml file. Users
can specify a list of ql packs to include in the analysis.

For a single language analysis, the packs property looks like this:

```yaml
packs:
  - pack-scope/[email protected]
  - pack-scope/pack-name2   # no explicit version means download the latest
```

For multi-language analysis, you must key the packs block by lanaguage:

```yaml
packs:
  cpp:
    - pack-scope/[email protected]
    - pack-scope/pack-name2
  java:
    - pack-scope/[email protected]
    - pack-scope/pack-name4
```

This implementation adds a new analysis run (alongside custom and 
builtin runs). The unit tests indicate that the correct commands are
being run, but I have not actually tried this with a real CLI.

Also, convert `instanceof Array` to `Array.isArray` since that is
sightly better in some situations. See:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/isArray#instanceof_vs_isarray
Use strings instead. They are easier to serialize and deserialize.
1. Better malformed data guard for PackDownloadOutput
2. Fix Packs type
3. Remove TODO in init-action
Uses two pre-existing packages to run some simple queries on a javascript
database.
Extract a `runTool` function that captures the stdout and returns it.
A small refactoring that reduces copied code.
Slightly simplifies the `parsePacks` function.
Also, make the baseline count message less awkward sounding.
@aeisenberg
Copy link
Contributor

Created accidentally based on a merge I ran earlier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant