Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Java: automodel application mode: use endpoint class like in framework mode #13886

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

kaeluka
Copy link
Contributor

@kaeluka kaeluka commented Aug 4, 2023

There now is a new endpoint class in application mode that mirrors the one we recently added to framework mode. The new class additionally has proper support for vararg arrays.

You'll find some documentation of how the class behaves in the qll file.
The test case in Test.java shows how varargs are treated.

Questions for Reviewers

  • For varargs arguments, we only use the first argument passed as endpoint (example). This is easy and avoids redundancy. We're not forced to do it that way, but it makes sense to me. Otherwise, we'd push complexity to the the classification script (eg., it might decide to use competing classifications for a given MaD model) and to the triage tooling. Do you agree?

fyi, @jhelie

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Java label Aug 4, 2023
@kaeluka kaeluka added the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label Aug 4, 2023
@kaeluka kaeluka force-pushed the kaeluka/java-automodel-variadic-args branch from 57cd4c1 to d31e48d Compare August 7, 2023 07:53
@kaeluka kaeluka force-pushed the kaeluka/java-automodel-variadic-args branch from 6f746c7 to e1a5eba Compare August 7, 2023 10:19
@kaeluka kaeluka force-pushed the kaeluka/java-automodel-variadic-args branch from 4906015 to 3433437 Compare August 7, 2023 12:15
@kaeluka kaeluka marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2023 14:26
@kaeluka kaeluka requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2023 14:26
@kaeluka
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaeluka commented Aug 8, 2023

@jcogs33, are you able to take a look? CI Checks are ✅

@jcogs33
Copy link
Contributor

jcogs33 commented Aug 8, 2023

@jcogs33, are you able to take a look? CI Checks are ✅

Sure, I'll try to take a look sometime tomorrow (2023/08/09).

Copy link
Contributor

@jcogs33 jcogs33 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a couple minor questions, otherwise looks reasonable to me. You might want a second pair of 👀 since I'm not sure if I'm familiar enough with the automodel code (as my questions might show 🙂).

For varargs arguments, we only use the first argument passed as endpoint (example). This is easy and avoids redundancy. We're not forced to do it that way, but it makes sense to me. Otherwise, we'd push complexity to the the classification script (eg., it might decide to use competing classifications for a given MaD model) and to the triage tooling. Do you agree?

I agree that just using the the first varargs argument as endpoint sounds like the best solution.

@kaeluka
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaeluka commented Aug 14, 2023

Thanks for the thorough review 🥳 I think I've addressed your comments :)

Copy link
Contributor

@jcogs33 jcogs33 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable to me :)

@kaeluka kaeluka merged commit 20254c3 into main Aug 16, 2023
8 checks passed
@kaeluka kaeluka deleted the kaeluka/java-automodel-variadic-args branch August 16, 2023 06:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Java no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants