Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: README example that demonstrates multiple search queries with 1 report #49

Closed
zkoppert opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #93
Closed

feat: README example that demonstrates multiple search queries with 1 report #49

zkoppert opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #93
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zkoppert
Copy link
Member

README example that demonstrates multiple search queries with 1 report

Use case: I want to be able to run different searches in different repositories and report on the metrics in a single markdown report
Use case: I want to be able to see both open and closed issues over a certain time period

This could look like feeding the action a list of SEARCH_QUERYs or a workflow file that ties together several json outputs to create a single markdown report.

@Okabe-Junya
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!

I have created a workflow to accomplish this and inspected that it works well in a sandbox environment. I'd like to send a PR later.

Screenshot 2023-08-03 at 4 07 21

During inspection in my sandbox repo, I accidentally attached several reference comments to the issue because I was collecting metrics from this repo. (This is how it appears from my environment.)

Screenshot 2023-08-03 at 4 16 56

This is not ideal, so I made my sandbox repo private, but if it's no problem, I would like to make it public again. (It's certainly not malicious spam.)

I hope the PR will be merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants