Make the output of `gno precompile` more parseable #1636

tbruyelle · 2024-02-07T18:03:02Z

Description

The current output of gno precompile -gobuild is hard to parse because it mixes 3 kinds of errors, with different format:

errors from ast.Parse the gno file content:

<file.gno>: precompile: parse: <file.gno>:<line>:<col>: <error>

Example:
gnovm/tests/backup/bad0.gno: precompile: parse: gnovm/tests/backup/bad0.gno:1:1: expected 'package', found println

errors from precompileAst function, which basically verifies that all import are whitelisted:

<file.gno>: precompile: <error>

Examples:
import "<pkg>" is not in the white list
failed to replace the <pkg> package with <?>

errors from the go build -v -tags=gno command:

<file.gno.gen.go>:<line>:<col>: <error>

Example:
./gnotest.gno.gen.go:9:2: undefined: Y

Improvement

To make it easier for tools like gnols to parse the output, all errors should have the same format, and should only output errors for gno files (and not .gno.gen.go files like in 3).

I think the best format should be something as simple as 3, but for gno file only:

<file.gno>:<line>:<col>: <error>

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Add all kinds of errors described in gnolang#1636.

Add all kinds of errors described in #1636. To run these tests: ``` go test ./gnovm/cmd/gno -v -run Precompile ```  <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>

Add all kinds of errors described in gnolang#1636. To run these tests: ``` go test ./gnovm/cmd/gno -v -run Precompile ```  <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>

This test was actually only testing the private `precompileAST` function and not the public `Precompile` function. The change makes it call the public function and add some more cases outlined in comments like - unknow-realm (no error) - syntax error - black list (was already done) - multiple files (not possible, `Precompile` is single file only) Also used multiple lines string for file and expected content, for better readability. Relates to gnolang#1636

This test actually only tested the private `precompileAST` function, not the public `Precompile` function. The change makes it call the public function and adds some more cases described in comments like: - unknow-realm (no error) - syntax error - blacklist (was already done) - multiple files (not possible, `Precompile` is single file only) Also used multiple-line string for file and expected content, for better readability. Relates to gnolang#1636

This test actually only tested the private `precompileAST()` function, not the public `Precompile()` function. The change makes it call the public function and adds some more cases described in comments like: - unknow-realm (no error) - syntax error - blacklist (was already done) - multiple files (not possible, `Precompile()` is single file only) Also used multiple-line string for file and expected content, for better readability. Relates to #1636 The test can be run with ``` go test ./gnovm/pkg/gnolang/ -v -run Precompile ```  <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [ ] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>

…#1670)  Fix #1636 Under the hood, use `scanner.ErrorList` from the stdlib all the way to store all errors with the filename and the position in the file. Note that kind of error is already returned by `parser.ParserFile`. For the `go build` output, instead of printing it like it is, parse it and shift it to represent the related gno file. Run the tests: ``` $ go test ./gnovm/cmd/gno -v -run Test_ScriptsPrecompile ``` <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [ ] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>

This test actually only tested the private `precompileAST()` function, not the public `Precompile()` function. The change makes it call the public function and adds some more cases described in comments like: - unknow-realm (no error) - syntax error - blacklist (was already done) - multiple files (not possible, `Precompile()` is single file only) Also used multiple-line string for file and expected content, for better readability. Relates to gnolang#1636 The test can be run with ``` go test ./gnovm/pkg/gnolang/ -v -run Precompile ```  <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [ ] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>

…gnolang#1670)  Fix gnolang#1636 Under the hood, use `scanner.ErrorList` from the stdlib all the way to store all errors with the filename and the position in the file. Note that kind of error is already returned by `parser.ParserFile`. For the `go build` output, instead of printing it like it is, parse it and shift it to represent the related gno file. Run the tests: ``` $ go test ./gnovm/cmd/gno -v -run Test_ScriptsPrecompile ``` <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [ ] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>

github-project-automation bot added this to 🚀 The Launch [DEPRECATED] Feb 7, 2024

tbruyelle added the 🌟 improvement performance improvements, refactors ... label Feb 7, 2024

tbruyelle added a commit to tbruyelle/gno that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2024

test(precompile): add more cases

a0eaf67

Add all kinds of errors described in gnolang#1636.

tbruyelle mentioned this issue Feb 8, 2024

test(precompile): add more cases #1640

Merged

7 tasks

tbruyelle mentioned this issue Feb 15, 2024

test: improve gnovm/pkg/gnolang.TestPrecompile() #1659

Merged

7 tasks

This was referenced Feb 19, 2024

Handle gno precompile unified output tbruyelle/gnols#18

Closed

fix: unify the precompile output to make it easier to parse and read. #1670

Merged

thehowl closed this as completed in #1670 Feb 22, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Make the output of `gno precompile` more parseable #1636

Make the output of `gno precompile` more parseable #1636

tbruyelle commented Feb 7, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Make the output of gno precompile more parseable #1636

Make the output of gno precompile more parseable #1636

Comments

tbruyelle commented Feb 7, 2024 • edited Loading

Description

Improvement

Make the output of `gno precompile` more parseable #1636

Make the output of `gno precompile` more parseable #1636

tbruyelle commented Feb 7, 2024 •

edited

Loading