chore: replace all occurence of port 3665{6,7,8} to 2665{6,7,8}

[albttx]

s/36657/26657/g

I believe the port 36657 come because there was multiple testnet on the same server, so the port have been put to 36657.

tendermint default port is 266* and i believe we should keep everything conform to it.

I let test3 compatible with 26657 AND 36657 for legacy purpose

Contributors' checklist...

• Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
• Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
• Updated the official documentation or not needed
• No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
• Added references to related issues and PRs
• Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
• Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

[albttx]

Will update depending on CI response

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.33%. Comparing base (e4b39f9) to head (92dffc5).
Report is 19 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2178      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.00%   49.33%   +0.32%     
==========================================
  Files         576      576              
  Lines       77581    78336     +755     
==========================================
+ Hits        38022    38650     +628     
- Misses      36476    36568      +92     
- Partials     3083     3118      +35     

Flag	Coverage Δ
contribs/gnodev	24.18% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
contribs/gnofaucet	14.46% <ø> (-0.86%)	⬇️
contribs/gnokeykc	0.00% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnomd	0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/autocounterd	0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/genproto	0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/genstd	73.90% <ø> (ø)
misc/goscan	0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/logos	17.68% <ø> (ø)
misc/loop	0.00% <ø> (ø)
tm2	54.56% <100.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[thehowl]

cc @moul

[albttx]

@thehowl is this test failing "normal" https://github.com/gnolang/gno/actions/runs/9210109774/job/25336315992?pr=2178

[thehowl]

@albttx didn't finish the comment, but no it's not normal

the test is bad (it does an actual connection to the actual test3 node, we are aware), you should probably makes sure it keeps connecting to 36657...

[albttx]

@thehowl Deploying with https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/2178/files#diff-4d1103f730f8cf1eb77c7f7f1ccb5b28bd0eabd3d9bebd10e459a3fdb6ebae64R30 should do the trick ;)

I can do it if you want :)

[thehowl]

I don't see the code for supporting both 26657 and 36657 on test3.

Since both are going to be supported, please revert the changes in gnovm/pkg/gnomod/file_test.go

[moul]

The primary reason, iirc, was not to run multiple services on the same server but to clearly distinguish between a production instance and a development instance. It should be okay to consolidate this and depend solely on hosts and chain ID.

[albttx]

The primary reason, iirc, was not to run multiple services on the same server but to clearly distinguish between a production instance and a development instance. It should be okay to consolidate this and depend solely on hosts and chain ID.

@moul Ok, i thought it was the reasons. Nonetheless i believe the RPC port should never be exposed publicly without a proxy in front.