-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 382
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(gnovm): improved native bindings #859
Conversation
About adding // gnovm/stdlibs/math/native.go
- func Float64bits(f float64) uint64 { return math.Float64bits(f) }
+ func Float64bits(m *gno.Machine, f float64) uint64 { return math.Float64bits(f) } As a result, code generator updated the related binding like that : // gnovm/stdlibs/native.go
- r0 := lib1.Float64bits(p0)
+ r0 := lib1.Float64bits(
+ m,
+ p0) Then I ran the related test and it was OK : $ go test ./gnovm/tests/ -v -run 'TestFiles/float5' -count 1
=== RUN TestFilesNative
=== RUN TestFilesNative/float5_native.gno
--- PASS: TestFilesNative (0.01s)
--- PASS: TestFilesNative/float5_native.gno (0.00s)
=== RUN TestFiles
=== RUN TestFiles/float5_stdlibs.gno
--- PASS: TestFiles (0.02s)
--- PASS: TestFiles/float5_stdlibs.gno (0.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/gnolang/gno/gnovm/tests 0.035s Did I miss something ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not a big fan of code gen :). This solution is definitely better and cleaner than using pn.DefineNative
, but do you think that might be another way to implement this? maybe having two ways of adding external code that won't be executed by the VM, one for the standard library and the other for specific std calls (using this method).
@tbruyelle yes, it may work on some functions. However it doesn't seem to work particularly well for instance with this diff: diff --git a/gnovm/stdlibs/time/time.gno b/gnovm/stdlibs/time/time.gno
index 7b7e45ba..dfae44b0 100644
--- a/gnovm/stdlibs/time/time.gno
+++ b/gnovm/stdlibs/time/time.gno
@@ -80,8 +80,6 @@ package time
import (
"errors"
-
- ios "internal/os" // XXX to access time.
// XXX _ "unsafe" // for go:linkname
)
@@ -1071,17 +1069,14 @@ func daysSinceEpoch(year int) uint64 {
return d
}
-/* XXX replaced with ios.Now()
-// Provided by package runtime.
func now() (sec int64, nsec int32, mono int64)
-*/
// XXX SHIM
// runtimeNano returns the current value of the runtime clock in nanoseconds.
//
//go:linkname runtimeNano runtime.nanotime
func runtimeNano() int64 {
- _, _, mono := ios.Now() // XXX now()
+ _, _, mono := now()
return mono
}
@@ -1095,7 +1090,7 @@ var startNano int64 = runtimeNano() - 1
// Now returns the current local time.
func Now() Time {
- sec, nsec, mono := ios.Now() // XXX now()
+ sec, nsec, mono := now()
mono -= startNano
sec += unixToInternal - minWall
if uint64(sec)>>33 != 0 {
(note: now() is implemented as X_now in native.go) This generates the following panic:
It definitely should work on some functions; the panic issue may be more related to calling native functions within the same package (which, by the way, is something that I think we should support, instead of continuing with what we're doing now whereby if we need to use native functions within a package, they need to be in a different package in order for the injecting function to work.) |
@ajnavarro on the other hand, I'm not a fan of reflection for "hot" code :) (partly for performance, but also because I think that not using reflection generates a lot of dumb code which actually makes it easier to track down what it's doing compared to reflection; but I digress). It is not entirely clear to me what you're saying here:
So you're proposing that there should be code-gen for functions which rely on But aside from personal preference, I'll try stating my case as to why I think code generation is a better fit for what we're trying to do here: I'm starting off from the premise that the primary goal is that of having native functions be declared in Gno code (but not defined); this serves the purpose of improving documentation for end users, as native methods don't have to be tracked down in Gno internals but can be seen clearly in the source and exposed by tools such as Then, a secondary goal is making it easier to define native functions and to allow for a (likely) increase of their use as we add more standard libraries; by making it so that some functions can be simply defined with their matching gno signature, without having to do all the boilerplate that is needed in stdlibs.go right now to even get a parameter and return a result, converting from the go type system to Gno. Note that this is not to say that standard libraries should just be bindings to go's standard libraries; discussing with Ray I think one thing that has not been made very clear is that I still think native bindings have very limited scope in the standard libraries to where they make sense (you need *gno.Machine, and/or the function would be very slow in pure gno) So, with these premises, I think the arguments in favour are:
Ultimately, I think that we want native code organised in the different packages where they're applied; so a "decent" proposal for how the code would look, taking sha256 as an examples to show how the reflection approach would work, is the following: package sha256
import (
"crypto/sha256"
)
var Fns = map[string]interface{}{
"Sum256": func(data []byte) [32]byte {
return sha256.Sum256(data)
},
}
// stdlibs/native.go or similar
import "github.com/gnolang/gno/stdlibs/crypto/sha256"
// ...
addBindings(sha256.Fns)
// ... Note that each additional package added or remove entails modifying a relative stdlibs/native.go or similar file. Plus, if you want to make sure that the functions match those of gno code, you need to add some code checking for it at runtime; while here you get it trivially at "gen-time" because checking that they match is part of trivial validation that is done even by the POC at this stage. </daily-wall-of-text> :) |
You sold me pretty well the code generation, I buy it :). Let's push this forward and improve the solution if needed through the implementation process. My only worry is that we might be mixing our std package with some parts of the Go standard library, that's why I proposed different ways to add custom external methods to the VM, one auto for all the validated methods from the standard library, and another way for custom methods being executed outside the VM OPs system. Nit: I think your example above could be refactored to: var Fns = map[string]interface{}{
"Sum256": sha256.Sum256
},
} right? |
Yes, you're right :)
I think it's useful to start with one system, and we'll see how things develop from there :) |
Well, I did some homework to try to track this issue further. What I found is that this is an issue of the time package as a global variable declaration depends on the now() function, which should be injected natively: var startNano int64 = runtimeNano() - 1 (runtimeNano then calls Though of course I believe that this should be a case we can and should handle correctly.
That would be a good idea, the problem is that Go2Gno and ParseFile are ignorant about their context; ie. they don't know what package they're parsing. stdlib injections obviously need to know that, so I don't think it's actually the correct spot where to do it. I've uncommented the code to add the panic() body. This makes it so that user-defined bodyless functions panic when they're called; ie. this feature is ineffective outside of the gnovm. Current stateThe currently-pushed code tries to inject the native function by having a new option/field in the Machine struct:
However, we also log the point where now() is called with OpCall, and the pointer to
Note that aside from the pointer being different, crucially, nativeBody is nil, so So I think we either:
I think 2. is better, possibly, although I'm not sure (a) where we define uverse functions when running RunFiles and (b) how to modify definitions to fail on empty func calls effectively (this I would imagine somewhere in I'm currently running tests with this command:
As addr0b it is the earliest failing test, as it imports the time package. |
This confuses me, since it's uncommented, the |
Give a look at
I suggest keeping a strong separation, we're considering making uverse even more independent; at the end we'll probably have something like this:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm severely late to the party with an official review, even though I've went through the PR months ago.
It is great. The detailed description you've provided in the PR, but also as part of the code changes, were super helpful in helping me navigate the scope of what you set out to accomplish. I'm not 100% familiar with the VM code, so it was nice having a guard rail while diving into the code. I genuinely wish all of our PRs were this detailed 🙂
The comments I've left are mostly nitpicks, and questions I've had regarding implementations. Please feel free to resolve anything that requires more than a nanosecond to fix / change; I understand this PR is on the back-burner as-is, and I want us to move it into the master
codestream as soon as possible.
Please update the PR with the latest master
changes, so we can go ahead and close the chapter on this effort 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a few remaining suggestions and one correction (the GetPointerTo can be inlined). Otherwise pre-approving. Sorry this took too long. But also this is the coolest single contribution I've ever seen for Gno so far. Thank you!
where is the list of "notable contributions"? put this in dar. |
…ngs-poc Let's see how much stuff we've broken.
(merged as the failing CI was just due to codecov) |
## Description This PR introduces a small reorg to the docs structure. Our docs follow the [Diataxis](https://diataxis.fr/) framework, but upon further thought I don't believe that we need to or that we should follow the framework 1:1, as it can be too rigid at times. IMHO it is more understandable to have the "Explanation" category renamed to "Concepts" or "Gno Concepts". While this is a minor change, I believe people who are not aware of Diataxis will find "Concepts" more intuitive. This PR also extracts the "Gno Tooling" out of "Explanation", as the category deserves its own spot in the sidebar. EDIT: This PR also resolves the conflict with and modifies the `docs/reference/standard-library.md` file (merged with [#859](#859)). <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [x] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [x] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>
#1459) A (IMHO) better method of handling this. Related discussion: #859 (comment) Avoids creating a panic/recover in Preprocess by handling the "redeclaration" case directly when it happens. cc/ @jaekwon to confirm whether he agrees it's a good solution. (suggestion: review with whitespace hidden)
This PR provides an initial transition and groundwork to move from native bindings as "package injections", whereby an injector function is called after package parsing and loading to provide built-in natives, to the new design described in gnolang#814. ## Status The PR is currently ready for review. - [x] Fix all tests and ensure precompiling has no issues - [x] Find out if the errors that arise when running the tests with `DEBUG=1` are bugs introduced by this PR or not - [x] Create temporary exceptions for linked types (like `std.{Coins,Address,Realm}`), so that all normal native bindings run exclusively on the new system, awaiting `//gno:link` (see gnolang#814). - [x] Finding a permanent place for ExecContext (see comment on `gnovm/stdlibs/context.go`); suggestions welcome (tm2/vm?) - [x] Include code generation in Makefiles and add a CI check to make sure PRs do generate code when necessary - [x] And some unit tests for the new functionality / potential edge cases. - [x] make sure all injected functions have `// injected` as a comment Next steps, after merging this PR, include: - Supporting precompilation of native functions by linking directly to the Go source in stdlibs/, removing the necessity of `stdshim`. - Supporting the test-only tests/stdlibs/ directory in `gno doc`; as well as documenting native functions explicitly by adding the `// injected` comment after their declaration. - Making all of the native-only packages defined in tests/imports.go native bindings; so that the special packages and native values are restricted only to ImportModeNativePreferred, while everything else uses documentable native bindings also for tests. ## Implementation Summary A new API has been added to `gnolang.Store`: `NativeStore`. This is a simple function which resolves a package and a name of a function to a native function.[^1] This is used to resolve native bindings first and foremost in `preprocess.go`, which also adds information about the native binding in `NativePkg` and `NativeName`, two new fields in `*gnolang.FuncValue`. The purpose of `NativePkg` and `NativeName` is to 1. enable assigning native functions to other function types, including function parameters or func type variables and 2. being able to easily and effectively persist the FuncValue during realm de/serialization. This way, `op_call.go` can recover the value of `nativeBody` if it is nil. On the other side, examples of the new stdlibs can be seen in the `gnovm/stdlibs` directory, where everything except a few functions in package `std` have been ported to the new system. The code generator in `misc/genstd` parses the AST of both the Go and Gno files, and ultimately generates `native.go`, which contains the porting code from the Gno function call to Go and back. To support the test contexts, which needs to have different function implementation or entirely new functions, an additional stdlibs directory was added to the `tests` directory. This is still code generated with the same generator and follows the same structure. When stdlibs are loaded for tests, the code in tests/stdlibs/, if it exists, is loaded with "higher priority" compared to normal `stdlibs` code.[^2] ### Suggested order for reviewing (and some notes) 1. `pkg/gnolang` for the core of the changes, starting from `values.go`, `preprocess.go`, `op_call.go`, `store.go`, `realm.go` which show how NativePkg, NativeName and nativeBody interact * `gnovm/pkg/gnolang/op_eval.go` adds the type of the evaluated expression, as I think it's useful to understand in what terms something is being evaluated; specifically I added it to better distinguish between `DEBUG: EVAL: (*gnolang.CallExpr) std<VPBlock(3,0)>.TestCurrentRealm()` and `DEBUG: EVAL: (*gnolang.SelectorExpr) std<VPBlock(3,0)>.TestCurrentRealm`. I think it's useful, but we can remove it if we prefer to keep it simpler. * `gnovm/pkg/gnolang/op_expressions.go` adds a new debug print pretending we're popping and pushing the value stack. This is to make clear what's happening in the debug logs (we're really swapping the value at the pointer), and I've made it `v[S]` so it's clear that the log is not coming from `PushValue/PopValue`. * I removed a goto-loop in `gnovm/pkg/gnolang/values.go` because I don't see it as beneficial when it's essentially just doing a for loop; if the concern was inlining, even with goto the function is too "costly" for the go compiler to inline. 2. `misc/genstd` contains the code generator and the template it uses to generate the files, ie. `gnovm/stdlibs/native.go` and `gnovm/tests/stdlibs/native.go`. 3. `stdlibs` and `tests/stdlibs` changes show the new stdlib directories, which genstd uses to generate code. The `tests/stdlibs` is available only in test environments, and there are also some overriding definitions to those in normal stdlibs. * `gnovm/stdlibs/encoding/base64/base64.gno` removes a check on `strconv.IntSize`. This is because `strconv.IntSize` is dependent on the system and thus is non-deterministic behaviour on the Gnovm. I don't know if `int` in Gno is == Go's `int` or it is precisely defined to be 64-bits; in any case I don't think it should be dependent on the system as this wouldn't work in a blockchain scenario. 4. Changes to `tm2` and `gnovm/tests/imports.go` mostly relate to wiring up the new NativeStore to the gnovm where it's used. 5. Changes to `examples` and `tests/files` (except for float5) are all updates to golden tests. <details><summary>Checklists...</summary> <p> ## Contributors Checklist - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [x] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [x] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests ## Maintainers Checklist - [ ] Checked that the author followed the guidelines in `CONTRIBUTING.md` - [ ] Checked the conventional-commit (especially PR title and verb, presence of `BREAKING CHANGE:` in the body) - [ ] Ensured that this PR is not a significant change or confirmed that the review/consideration process was appropriate for the change </p> </details> [^1]: Currently, the only native bindings that are supported with the new system are top-level functions. I think we can keep it this way in the spirit of [KISS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle); maybe think of extending it if we find appropriate usage. [^2]: See gnolang.RunMemPackageWithOverrides --------- Co-authored-by: Thomas Bruyelle <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: jaekwon <[email protected]>
## Description This PR introduces a small reorg to the docs structure. Our docs follow the [Diataxis](https://diataxis.fr/) framework, but upon further thought I don't believe that we need to or that we should follow the framework 1:1, as it can be too rigid at times. IMHO it is more understandable to have the "Explanation" category renamed to "Concepts" or "Gno Concepts". While this is a minor change, I believe people who are not aware of Diataxis will find "Concepts" more intuitive. This PR also extracts the "Gno Tooling" out of "Explanation", as the category deserves its own spot in the sidebar. EDIT: This PR also resolves the conflict with and modifies the `docs/reference/standard-library.md` file (merged with [gnolang#859](gnolang#859)). <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [x] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [x] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details>
gnolang#1459) A (IMHO) better method of handling this. Related discussion: gnolang#859 (comment) Avoids creating a panic/recover in Preprocess by handling the "redeclaration" case directly when it happens. cc/ @jaekwon to confirm whether he agrees it's a good solution. (suggestion: review with whitespace hidden)
|
||
{{ range $pn, $pv := $m.Params -}} | ||
{{- if not $pv.IsTypedValue }} | ||
gno.Gno2GoValue(b.GetPointerTo(nil, gno.NewValuePathBlock(1, {{ $pn }}, "")).TV, rp{{ $pn }}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- How is template.tmpl file generated? It seems
go generate
does not work. - Where is the source of line 55, or is it manually coded?
- Let's say if we found a bug in generated native.go. what are the steps involved to make changes and fix it?
This PR provides an initial transition and groundwork to move from native bindings as "package injections", whereby an injector function is called after package parsing and loading to provide built-in natives, to the new design described in #814.
Status
The PR is currently ready for review.
DEBUG=1
are bugs introduced by this PR or notstd.{Coins,Address,Realm}
), so that all normal native bindings run exclusively on the new system, awaiting//gno:link
(see [META] improved native bindings #814).gnovm/stdlibs/context.go
); suggestions welcome (tm2/vm?)// injected
as a commentNext steps, after merging this PR, include:
stdshim
.gno doc
; as well as documenting native functions explicitly by adding the// injected
comment after their declaration.Implementation Summary
A new API has been added to
gnolang.Store
:NativeStore
. This is a simple function which resolves a package and a name of a function to a native function.1 This is used to resolve native bindings first and foremost inpreprocess.go
, which also adds information about the native binding inNativePkg
andNativeName
, two new fields in*gnolang.FuncValue
.The purpose of
NativePkg
andNativeName
is to 1. enable assigning native functions to other function types, including function parameters or func type variables and 2. being able to easily and effectively persist the FuncValue during realm de/serialization. This way,op_call.go
can recover the value ofnativeBody
if it is nil.On the other side, examples of the new stdlibs can be seen in the
gnovm/stdlibs
directory, where everything except a few functions in packagestd
have been ported to the new system. The code generator inmisc/genstd
parses the AST of both the Go and Gno files, and ultimately generatesnative.go
, which contains the porting code from the Gno function call to Go and back.To support the test contexts, which needs to have different function implementation or entirely new functions, an additional stdlibs directory was added to the
tests
directory. This is still code generated with the same generator and follows the same structure. When stdlibs are loaded for tests, the code in tests/stdlibs/, if it exists, is loaded with "higher priority" compared to normalstdlibs
code.2Suggested order for reviewing (and some notes)
pkg/gnolang
for the core of the changes, starting fromvalues.go
,preprocess.go
,op_call.go
,store.go
,realm.go
which show how NativePkg, NativeName and nativeBody interactgnovm/pkg/gnolang/op_eval.go
adds the type of the evaluated expression, as I think it's useful to understand in what terms something is being evaluated; specifically I added it to better distinguish betweenDEBUG: EVAL: (*gnolang.CallExpr) std<VPBlock(3,0)>.TestCurrentRealm()
andDEBUG: EVAL: (*gnolang.SelectorExpr) std<VPBlock(3,0)>.TestCurrentRealm
. I think it's useful, but we can remove it if we prefer to keep it simpler.gnovm/pkg/gnolang/op_expressions.go
adds a new debug print pretending we're popping and pushing the value stack. This is to make clear what's happening in the debug logs (we're really swapping the value at the pointer), and I've made itv[S]
so it's clear that the log is not coming fromPushValue/PopValue
.gnovm/pkg/gnolang/values.go
because I don't see it as beneficial when it's essentially just doing a for loop; if the concern was inlining, even with goto the function is too "costly" for the go compiler to inline.misc/genstd
contains the code generator and the template it uses to generate the files, ie.gnovm/stdlibs/native.go
andgnovm/tests/stdlibs/native.go
.stdlibs
andtests/stdlibs
changes show the new stdlib directories, which genstd uses to generate code. Thetests/stdlibs
is available only in test environments, and there are also some overriding definitions to those in normal stdlibs.gnovm/stdlibs/encoding/base64/base64.gno
removes a check onstrconv.IntSize
. This is becausestrconv.IntSize
is dependent on the system and thus is non-deterministic behaviour on the Gnovm. I don't know ifint
in Gno is == Go'sint
or it is precisely defined to be 64-bits; in any case I don't think it should be dependent on the system as this wouldn't work in a blockchain scenario.tm2
andgnovm/tests/imports.go
mostly relate to wiring up the new NativeStore to the gnovm where it's used.examples
andtests/files
(except for float5) are all updates to golden tests.Checklists...
Contributors Checklist
BREAKING CHANGE: xxx
message was included in the descriptionMaintainers Checklist
CONTRIBUTING.md
BREAKING CHANGE:
in the body)Footnotes
Currently, the only native bindings that are supported with the new system are top-level functions. I think we can keep it this way in the spirit of KISS; maybe think of extending it if we find appropriate usage. ↩
See gnolang.RunMemPackageWithOverrides ↩