Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(enhancement): update godoc, method signature, and cleanup unused symbols #936

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

jeevatkm
Copy link
Member

@jeevatkm jeevatkm commented Jan 2, 2025

  • add license text

@jeevatkm jeevatkm added enhancement v3 For resty v3 labels Jan 2, 2025
@jeevatkm jeevatkm added this to the v3.0.0 Milestone milestone Jan 2, 2025
@jeevatkm jeevatkm self-assigned this Jan 2, 2025
@jeevatkm jeevatkm merged commit b4ff634 into v3 Jan 2, 2025
6 checks passed
@jeevatkm jeevatkm deleted the improve-circuit-breaker branch January 2, 2025 06:04
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.81%. Comparing base (c6b08cf) to head (af7b4a7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on v3.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               v3     #936      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.81%   99.81%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        3788     3787       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         3781     3780       -1     
  Misses          5        5              
  Partials        2        2              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.81% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement v3 For resty v3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant