-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix uninitialized variables #171
Merged
paganotoni
merged 2 commits into
gobuffalo:main
from
Mido-sys:fix_non_initialized_variables
Dec 26, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -27,7 +27,19 @@ func Test_Let_Reassignment(t *testing.T) { | |
r.NoError(err) | ||
r.Equal("bar\n \n \nbaz", strings.TrimSpace(s)) | ||
} | ||
func Test_Let_Ident_NotInitialized(t *testing.T) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. please add a line before function start and end |
||
r := require.New(t) | ||
input := `<% let foo | ||
if (foo){ | ||
foo = 1 | ||
} | ||
%>` | ||
|
||
ctx := NewContext() | ||
|
||
_, err := Render(input, ctx) | ||
r.Error(err) | ||
} | ||
func Test_Let_Reassignment_UnknownIdent(t *testing.T) { | ||
r := require.New(t) | ||
input := `<% foo = "baz" %>` | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to prevent using reflect in this loop. Too much reflection, and actually this is not necessary. I will leave another comment for the solution, based on the real issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sio4 , Yes, there's another way to update the
parseLetStatement()
functionto return
stmt
instead ofnil
. However, we will have to update all the parser functions to not return nil as callingstmt.String()
will panic if any of the parser functions returnnil
. I made the decision to use reflection as it's the safest route considering how heavily plush relies on interfaces{} and reflections.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct. also, we can fix
parseStatement()
, and that could be the best. (See my another comment) With your PR, the for loop on tokens will reflect all statements returned and it is expensive and not necessary.