Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.

Better landing page request #1457

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 14, 2013
Merged

Better landing page request #1457

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 14, 2013

Conversation

chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

I am running a project, which has a website with relatively big enough volume of visitors. (thousands per day). I would like to let them know about the possibility to donate money to the project by using gittip.

My intention was to explain briefly what gittip is and provide a link to my gittip landing page. However, my gittip landing page looks like this:
https://www.gittip.com/Tomas-M/
Please review the landing page when you are not signed in to gittip - as like 100% of my users will see it, since they are NOT signed in to gittip. What is the problem? The landing page is very confusing for a person who never saw it. It provides NO donate button (or similar). It provides no explanation for NEW users (who never saw gittip) what to do next. Probably the next step is to register / sign in, but users will not understand that.

I believe this is very important issue. New user must easily understand what to do next.

Suggestion: at least, if nothing else, please put there BIG wording like
Tomas-M RECEIVES
$0.00
per week, and gives $0.00

(the numbers are currently not there if I am not receiving anything yet. Providing the numbers will show the user that this is the place where money matters). And put there a wording which explains to the non-registered user that in order to donate, he should sign-in or register. I am also missing some wording which explains briefly what gittip is to the new visitor. This all will increase chances that a visitor sent to my landing page will easily understand what to do next in order to contribute.

Better will be of course to offer donations for non-registered users as well (to actually ask them to register/signin later, during the donation process, after they selected the amount to donate), but this may be more complicated. I'll be perfectly happy with the suggestions mentioned above. I am ready to start sending thousand visitors daily to my landing page.

Thanks

@wyze
Copy link
Contributor

wyze commented Sep 14, 2013

This somewhat ties into #133.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

We used to show the donation widget on profile pages to anonymous site users. Not sure what happened to that ...

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@Tomas-M I agree that the profile page could use an overhaul, but fixing this (#1320) regression should at least stop the bleeding for now.

@zbynekwinkler
Copy link
Contributor

I am about to start sending some users myself. I have not thought about the details yet but having a clear action to take on the landing page makes very much sense. So 👍 for having the donation widget available for anon users and requesting the sign in during donation. Also having the link for https://www.gittip.com/about/ somewhere more prominent would help. The ticket #133 includes all this but is too "big" to inspire some action right now.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@zwn Wanna review the PR here and merge if it works for you?

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

I should also mention #1167, which is a half-started attempt to provide a streamlined checkout experience (both on www.gittip.com and as a widget on other websites).

This one is a little convoluted. We introduced the cent sign unicode
character into our mark-up at some point (#1070?), and that should've
been in the output of the self.get call in this case but wasn't because
of the #1457 bug. The test still passed because it's not a test for the
cent sign.
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

Let me be clearer: there is supposed to be a "Sign in to start giving" call to action on all profile pages, when viewed anonymously. It's supposed to look like this:

screen shot 2013-09-14 at 3 43 13 pm

That's not being shown right now due to a regression introduced with #1320. I've promoted this issue to a pull request with a fix for that regression. @zwn: If this fix works for you locally (you can see the call to action for anon profile views) then please go ahead and merge this pull request (GitHub merge button is fine).

@zbynekwinkler
Copy link
Contributor

@whit537 Ok, I'll look into it.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@zwn Thanks! :-)

@zbynekwinkler
Copy link
Contributor

@whit537 I see locally what is on your attached screenshot. However, what is supposed to happen when I click "confirm" when not signed in? Right now a popup is shown that the tip has been changed. On the network side there was a POST request to tip.json that returned 200 and the content was empty dict.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@zwn Yeah, that's a pre-existing bug (#1112).

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@zwn ... so I would say let's deal with that separately after we land this PR.

zbynekwinkler added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2013
Fix regression where anon couldn't start tipping
@zbynekwinkler zbynekwinkler merged commit c286a0b into master Sep 14, 2013
@zbynekwinkler zbynekwinkler deleted the anon-tip branch September 14, 2013 20:38
@Tomas-M
Copy link
Author

Tomas-M commented Sep 14, 2013

Clicking "Confirm" while not signed in should say a warning message "please sign in" because else it makes no sense. If I confirm some amount and THEN sign in then my confirmed amount is lost anyway.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@Tomas-M Right, sorry. :-/ That is the pre-existing bug that @zwn noted (#1112).

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants