Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.

rejected -> closed #3678

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2015
Merged

rejected -> closed #3678

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2015

Conversation

chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

"Rejecting" teams is too harsh a term for the situation we want to optimize for, wherein we reach a decision collaboratively together with team owners about whether they and we are a good fit for each other. I think we should use the term "close" instead. That leaves ambiguous the circumstances surrounding the closing, whereas "rejected" only covers the harshest case, wherein Gratipay acts despite the owner's intention. A "closed" account could be closed by the owner's decision, by Gratipay's, or by both agreeing together.

"Rejecting" teams is too harsh a term for the situation we want to
optimize for, wherein we reach a decision collaboratively together with
team owners about whether they and we are a good fit for each other. I
think we should use the term "closed" instead. That leaves ambiguous the
circumstances surrounding the closing, whereas "rejected" only covers
the harshest case, wherein Gratipay acts despite the owner's intention.
A "closed" account could be closed by the owner's decision, by
Gratipay's, or by both agreeing together.
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping @mattbk @kzisme @rohitpaulk et al.

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ title = name = team.name
<div class="col0">
{% if team.is_approved in (None, False) %}
{% if team.is_approved == None %}unreviewed{% endif %}
{% if team.is_approved == False %}rejected{% endif %} |
{% if team.is_approved == False %}closed{% endif %} |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if it's used anywhere, but it would be cleaner to use the status property -

def status(self):

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good find! I looked for that in the database schema, I didn't think to check for a computed property.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 2e9919b.

rohitpaulk added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2015
@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk merged commit 6c99ba9 into master Aug 13, 2015
@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk deleted the rejected-closed branch August 13, 2015 12:10
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants