Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert version.sbt to 1.0.40-SNAPSHOT #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

Revert version.sbt to 1.0.40-SNAPSHOT #133

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

tkgnm
Copy link
Contributor

@tkgnm tkgnm commented Dec 4, 2024

Our automated release workflow failed partway through because of an expired key which has since been rectified. However, the workflow did succeed far enough to make this commit which removes the snapshot suffix. Subsequently, when I tried to run the release again, it failed as it was expecting the "snapshot" suffix. This PR essentially reverts that commit so we can give the release another go.

Our automated workflow failed partway through and left the version.sbt in a bad state.
@tkgnm tkgnm marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 09:50
@tkgnm tkgnm requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2024 09:50
Copy link
Member

@rtyley rtyley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, this looks good! Definitely the best fix for this problem, especially as no git tag for 1.0.40 has been pushed.

What's interesting is that really, getting into this situation, where you need to revert a commit, should not be necessary - as mentioned in the issue below, it would be better if gha-scala-library-release-workflow did an initial check that the signing key was good before it started doing changes that require manual recovery steps (like updating the default branch):

@tkgnm tkgnm merged commit 56ccdad into main Dec 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@tkgnm tkgnm deleted the revert-snapshot branch December 5, 2024 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants