Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use JDT jars from maven central rather than packaging our own #10026

Open
niloc132 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #10082
Open

Use JDT jars from maven central rather than packaging our own #10026

niloc132 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #10082

Comments

@niloc132
Copy link
Member

niloc132 commented Nov 1, 2024

Will help avoid issues like #10025.

A necessary component for #10011.

Light testing seems to suggest that

            <dependency>
                <groupId>org.eclipse.jdt</groupId>
                <artifactId>org.eclipse.jdt.core</artifactId>
                <version>3.32.0</version>
            </dependency>

functions the same as our re-packaged jars, and repackaging may no longer be required at all.

vegegoku added a commit to vegegoku/tools that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2025
Use JDT jars from maven central rather than packaging our own

related to gwtproject/gwt#10026
vegegoku added a commit to vegegoku/gwt that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2025
Use JDT jars from maven central rather than packaging our own

Fix gwtproject#10026
vegegoku added a commit to vegegoku/gwt that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2025
Use JDT jars from maven central rather than packaging our own

Fix gwtproject#10026
@vegegoku vegegoku linked a pull request Jan 9, 2025 that will close this issue
vegegoku added a commit to vegegoku/gwt that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2025
Use JDT jars from maven central rather than packaging our own

Fix gwtproject#10026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant