We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
with the liquid gem:
{{ "now" | date: "%s" | minus : 604800 | date: "%b %d, %Y %I:%M %p -0500" }} Apr 26, 2019 06:31 PM -0500
with liquidjs:
{{ "now" | date: "%s" | minus : 604800 | date: "%b %d, %Y %I:%M %p -0500" }}') 1556296343
I think parity with the liquid gem is a goal, I'm not sure the extent to which the outputs can differ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fix: date from integer, #125
fdf0043
chore(release): 8.2.2 [skip ci]
2cb4bff
## [8.2.2](v8.2.1...v8.2.2) (2019-05-12) ### Bug Fixes * date from integer, [#125](#125) ([fdf0043](fdf0043)) * pass drops directly to filters/tags ([bef2909](bef2909))
No branches or pull requests
with the liquid gem:
{{ "now" | date: "%s" | minus : 604800 | date: "%b %d, %Y %I:%M %p -0500" }} Apr 26, 2019 06:31 PM -0500with liquidjs:
{{ "now" | date: "%s" | minus : 604800 | date: "%b %d, %Y %I:%M %p -0500" }}') 1556296343I think parity with the liquid gem is a goal, I'm not sure the extent to which the outputs can differ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: