Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

POC: Allow for a data_seed #3150

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

POC: Allow for a data_seed #3150

merged 11 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

muellerzr
Copy link
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

Adds in the ability to pass in a data_seed when using the seedable_random_sampler. Alternative to #3130

Essentially all we really want to do is make sure that the initial_seed in the SeedableRandomSampler can be changed to not be the same as the one used by torch. so as a result, adds it to the DataLoaderConfiguration class

Fixes # (issue)

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.

@BenjaminBossan @SunMarc @MekkCyber

@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

Copy link
Member

@SunMarc SunMarc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ! Thanks for adding this !

Copy link
Member

@BenjaminBossan BenjaminBossan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants