-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for Ntag215 #191
Conversation
Nice, However, even this PR has Mini changes... If you can keep it even cleaner I would appreciate it |
yes you r right.I will push a new commit for clean it later |
Thanks for your direction.I will pay attention to it in the future. |
Firmware/ChameleonMini/Makefile
Outdated
@@ -62,17 +66,17 @@ ARCH = XMEGA | |||
BOARD = NONE | |||
F_CPU = 32000000 | |||
F_USB = 48000000 | |||
TARGET = ChameleonMini | |||
TARGET = Chameleon-RevE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think you should do this change. See next change below, why.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my opinion,the TARGET flag means firmware hex filename and the ChameleonMini.c is the fw src main entry.It is not the same thing.we shouldnt change the main entry."Chameleon-RevE" might more clearly.I think it should be common and general
the OBJDIR flag has a default value "obj",the value "Bin" should be the folder compiled hex files I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
although,I just thought it is convenience.If it confused you im sorry and I can revert it back
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice to see a better naming convention for the artifact. If so, when it should reflected in all diff wiki pages /documentations :)
Which would mean another PR...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah thats another PR.so I just revert the TARGET flag right now,and maybe create another PR to make things better :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you would need to revert the line you changed below, which used the TARGET ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure.my bad ;(
Thanks! |
merge ntag215 support codes from emsec repo