Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Ntag215 #191

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 22, 2021
Merged

Add support for Ntag215 #191

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 22, 2021

Conversation

ca1e
Copy link
Contributor

@ca1e ca1e commented Jan 22, 2021

merge ntag215 support codes from emsec repo

@iceman1001
Copy link
Owner

Nice, However, even this PR has Mini changes... If you can keep it even cleaner I would appreciate it

@ca1e
Copy link
Contributor Author

ca1e commented Jan 22, 2021

yes you r right.I will push a new commit for clean it later

@ca1e
Copy link
Contributor Author

ca1e commented Jan 22, 2021

Thanks for your direction.I will pay attention to it in the future.

@@ -62,17 +66,17 @@ ARCH = XMEGA
BOARD = NONE
F_CPU = 32000000
F_USB = 48000000
TARGET = ChameleonMini
TARGET = Chameleon-RevE
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you should do this change. See next change below, why.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my opinion,the TARGET flag means firmware hex filename and the ChameleonMini.c is the fw src main entry.It is not the same thing.we shouldnt change the main entry."Chameleon-RevE" might more clearly.I think it should be common and general
the OBJDIR flag has a default value "obj",the value "Bin" should be the folder compiled hex files I think.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

although,I just thought it is convenience.If it confused you im sorry and I can revert it back

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice to see a better naming convention for the artifact. If so, when it should reflected in all diff wiki pages /documentations :)

Which would mean another PR...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah thats another PR.so I just revert the TARGET flag right now,and maybe create another PR to make things better :)

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you would need to revert the line you changed below, which used the TARGET ;)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure.my bad ;(

@iceman1001 iceman1001 merged commit 9f958e9 into iceman1001:master Jan 22, 2021
@iceman1001
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants