rf: package name to use own repository

[debendraoli]

I have updated the package name to use our own repository instead of the previous one. This ensures that the code is properly organized and maintained. This is because of visibility too, anyone can utilize our works on their projects and so on.
Also we can independently publish our works beside the forked project.

And also static build to ensure binary distribution.

Downside is that we can submit our works to our upstream source and acceptance of our custom solutions deems hardly possible.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 20.83333% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 13.16%. Comparing base (478dea5) to head (290a590).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #224      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   11.47%   13.16%   +1.69%     
==========================================
  Files          85       70      -15     
  Lines       20409    17012    -3397     
==========================================
- Hits         2342     2240     -102     
+ Misses      17813    14530    -3283     
+ Partials      254      242      -12     

Files	Coverage Δ
cmd/chains.go	40.25% <100.00%> (ø)
cmd/config.go	31.54% <ø> (ø)
cmd/flags.go	54.37% <ø> (ø)
cmd/keys.go	53.81% <ø> (ø)
cmd/paths.go	30.57% <100.00%> (ø)
cmd/start.go	14.50% <ø> (ø)
cmd/tx.go	28.43% <ø> (+0.11%)	⬆️
cregistry/chain_info.go	11.97% <ø> (ø)
relayer/chain.go	5.26% <ø> (ø)
relayer/chains/cosmos/codec.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 46 more

... and 15 files with indirect coverage changes