Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump kvindexer and submodules #155

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

chore: bump kvindexer and submodules #155

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

Vritra4
Copy link
Contributor

@Vritra4 Vritra4 commented Feb 4, 2025

Description

Closes: #XXXX

bump kvindexer and its submodules


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency versions to rely on stable releases, ensuring improved reliability and consistency in the project's internal management.

@Vritra4 Vritra4 requested a review from beer-1 February 4, 2025 09:01
@Vritra4 Vritra4 self-assigned this Feb 4, 2025
@Vritra4 Vritra4 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2025 09:01
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

level=warning msg="[runner] Can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: buildir: failed to load package injective: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/cosmos/relayer/v2/relayer/codecs/injective""
level=error msg="Running error: can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter\nbuildir: failed to load package injective: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/cosmos/relayer/v2/relayer/codecs/injective""

Walkthrough

This change updates the dependency management in the go.mod file. The pseudo-version formats for the github.com/initia-labs/kvindexer package and its submodules (block, evm-nft, evm-tx, and pair) have been replaced with stable version numbers. Additionally, an indirect dependency on github.com/gobwas/ws was removed from the require block.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod Updated dependency versions for github.com/initia-labs/kvindexer and its submodules from pseudo-versions to stable versions; removed github.com/gobwas/ws.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • beer-1

Poem

I’m a rabbit, quick and keen,
Loving changes in code so clean,
Jumping over pseudo-versions with glee,
Stable numbers now set us free!
Hop along with me in this bright digital spree 🐇✨

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bdf8643 and e04e872.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@beer-1 beer-1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit 07e80e0 into main Feb 4, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the bump-kvindexer branch February 4, 2025 09:17
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2025
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants