Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Waiver file expiration dates misinterpretation fix #5586

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2021

Conversation

Nik08
Copy link
Contributor

@Nik08 Nik08 commented Jul 1, 2021

Signed-off-by: Nikita Mathur [email protected]

Description

Waiver file expiration dates misinterpretation fix. The issue was caused because of incorrect parsing of string formatted expiration date.

Related Issue

Fixes #5570

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New content (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (a content change which would break existing functionality or processes)

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.

@Nik08 Nik08 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2021 19:29
@Nik08 Nik08 requested review from alexpop and Vasu1105 July 1, 2021 19:29
@Nik08 Nik08 self-assigned this Jul 1, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 1, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for chef-inspec canceled.

🔨 Explore the source changes: 39dbb68

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/chef-inspec/deploys/60de17a55fe99f0008c49456

@Nik08 Nik08 requested review from clintoncwolfe and removed request for alexpop July 1, 2021 19:30
@clintoncwolfe clintoncwolfe merged commit bbc4ba7 into master Jul 8, 2021
@clintoncwolfe clintoncwolfe added Component: Waivers Type: Bug Feature not working as expected labels Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Waivers Type: Bug Feature not working as expected
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Waiver file expiration dates are not being interpreted correctly
2 participants