Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: convential commits spec #1405

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

docs: convential commits spec #1405

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

ab-smith
Copy link
Contributor

@ab-smith ab-smith commented Jan 22, 2025

will cover and fix #1334

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated conventional_commits.md with comprehensive guidelines for commit message standards
    • Added sections explaining the rationale behind Conventional Commits
    • Detailed commit message types and conventions
    • Clarified project's approach to semantic versioning and commit practices

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The conventional_commits.md document has been enhanced with comprehensive guidelines for commit message standards. The update introduces two new sections: "Why" and "Convention", which provide detailed insights into the project's approach to commit messaging. The documentation emphasizes the use of semantic versioning, squash merges, and specific commit types, while offering clear guidance for contributors on crafting meaningful commit messages.

Changes

File Change Summary
conventional_commits.md Added comprehensive sections on commit message conventions and rationale

Poem

🐰 Commit messages, neat and clean,
Semantic versioning's bright sheen
Types and scopes, a rabbit's delight
Squash and merge with all our might
Conventional commits take flight! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ab-smith ab-smith changed the title convential commits spec docs: convential commits spec Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
convential_commits.md (1)

1-10: Consider enhancing the rationale section with examples.

While the guidelines are clear, adding examples would make them more actionable:

  1. Show how semantic versioning ties into conventional commits (e.g., feat!: breaking change in API)
  2. Include examples of good PR titles that follow the convention
 - Semantic versioning is **mandatory** for Pull Requests, particularly the use of `!` for breaking changes.
+- Semantic versioning is **mandatory** for Pull Requests, particularly the use of `!` for breaking changes. For example:
+  - `feat(api)!: remove deprecated endpoints`
+  - `fix: resolve memory leak in worker pool`
+  - `docs: update installation guide`
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d0a017 and 63d35ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • convential_commits.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
  • GitHub Check: migrations-check (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
  • GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
  • GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
convential_commits.md (1)

1-23: Well-structured conventional commits documentation!

The document provides clear guidelines and rationale for adopting conventional commits. The balance between mandatory and recommended practices is pragmatic and should help with adoption.

Comment on lines +11 to +23
## Convention

- Use lowercase for all commit messages.
- Include a scope when relevant. For example, use `feat(lib)` when adding a new framework or library.
- The following commit types are supported:
- `fix`: Bug fixes
- `feat`: New features
- `chore`: Maintenance tasks or changes that don't affect production code
- `refactor`: Code changes that neither fix bugs nor add features
- `docs`: Documentation updates or improvements
- `test`: Adding or updating tests
- `ci`: Changes to the CI configuration or scripts
- `build`: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance convention details with additional guidelines.

Consider adding these important aspects of conventional commits:

  1. Guidelines for commit message body and footer
  2. Breaking change footer format (BREAKING CHANGE: description)
  3. Multi-line commit message format
  4. Common scope examples for your project
 - Include a scope when relevant. For example, use `feat(lib)` when adding a new framework or library.
+- Include a scope when relevant. Common scopes include:
+  - `api`: API-related changes
+  - `ui`: User interface changes
+  - `db`: Database changes
+  - `lib`: Library or dependency changes
+
+- Commit message format:
+  ```
+  <type>[optional scope]: <description>
+
+  [optional body]
+
+  [optional footer(s)]
+  ```
+
+- For breaking changes, include a footer:
+  ```
+  BREAKING CHANGE: <description>
+  ```
 - The following commit types are supported:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## Convention
- Use lowercase for all commit messages.
- Include a scope when relevant. For example, use `feat(lib)` when adding a new framework or library.
- The following commit types are supported:
- `fix`: Bug fixes
- `feat`: New features
- `chore`: Maintenance tasks or changes that don't affect production code
- `refactor`: Code changes that neither fix bugs nor add features
- `docs`: Documentation updates or improvements
- `test`: Adding or updating tests
- `ci`: Changes to the CI configuration or scripts
- `build`: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
## Convention
- Use lowercase for all commit messages.
- Include a scope when relevant. Common scopes include:
- `api`: API-related changes
- `ui`: User interface changes
- `db`: Database changes
- `lib`: Library or dependency changes
- Commit message format:

@ab-smith ab-smith merged commit 4f87b0d into main Jan 22, 2025
15 checks passed
@ab-smith ab-smith deleted the convential_commits_docs branch January 22, 2025 17:23
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: Adopt conventional commits and correct semantic versioning
1 participant