feat(ui): small optimizations of library presentation headers #1430
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces visual enhancements to the library details page in a Svelte component. The changes focus on improving the readability and presentation of library information by applying bold formatting to labels such as description, provider, packager, copyright, publication date, and dependencies. A new element for displaying the library version has been added, providing more comprehensive information about the library without altering the component's underlying logic or functionality. Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/libraries/[id=uuid]/+page.svelte (1)
135-135: Consider conditional rendering for the version field.While adding the version information is valuable, consider wrapping it in a conditional block like other optional fields to handle cases where version might be undefined or null.
- <p class="text-md leading-5 text-gray-700"><strong>{m.version()}</strong>: {data.library.version}</p> + {#if data.library.version} + <p class="text-md leading-5 text-gray-700"><strong>{m.version()}</strong>: {data.library.version}</p> + {/if}🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontend Linters
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/libraries/[id=uuid]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontend Linters
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/libraries/[id=uuid]/+page.svelte
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: migrations-check (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/libraries/[id=uuid]/+page.svelte (4)
132-134: LGTM! Consistent styling enhances readability.The bold formatting of labels and consistent text styling improves the visual hierarchy and readability of the library details.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontend Linters
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
138-140: LGTM! Proper date formatting with i18n support.The bold formatting is consistent, and the date formatting correctly uses the locale-aware utility.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontend Linters
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
153-153: LGTM! Consistent styling for copyright information.The implementation maintains consistency with other fields and includes proper conditional rendering.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontend Linters
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
132-153: Run Prettier to fix formatting issues.The GitHub Actions pipeline reports code style issues. Run Prettier with the
--writeflag to automatically fix the formatting:🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontend Linters
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
| <strong>{m.dependencies()}</strong>: | ||
| {#each data.library.dependencies as dependency} | ||
| <li>{dependency.name}</li> | ||
| {/each} | ||
| </p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix list markup for better semantics.
The current implementation nests <li> elements directly within a <p> tag, which is not semantically correct HTML. Wrap the list items in a <ul> tag for proper structure.
<p class="text-md leading-5 text-gray-700">
<strong>{m.dependencies()}</strong>:
+ <ul>
{#each data.library.dependencies as dependency}
<li>{dependency.name}</li>
{/each}
+ </ul>
</p>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <strong>{m.dependencies()}</strong>: | |
| {#each data.library.dependencies as dependency} | |
| <li>{dependency.name}</li> | |
| {/each} | |
| </p> | |
| <p class="text-md leading-5 text-gray-700"> | |
| <strong>{m.dependencies()}</strong>: | |
| <ul> | |
| {#each data.library.dependencies as dependency} | |
| <li>{dependency.name}</li> | |
| {/each} | |
| </ul> | |
| </p> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Frontend Linters
[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.
|
Hi @krismas, thanks a lot for this suggestion! To fix the failing test, you can run |
ab-smith
changed the title
Hi @Mohamed-Hacene That's what I'm doing right now... My changes didn't impact the structure of the code, but I think some new controls have been added recently! |
Add version number and bold for labels
Summary by CodeRabbit