Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: autocomplete arraysEqual leading to loops #1433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

nas-tabchiche
Copy link
Contributor

@nas-tabchiche nas-tabchiche commented Jan 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements
    • Enhanced array comparison function to support more flexible input types
    • Added normalization logic for comparing arrays with different formats
    • Improved handling of null, undefined, and single string inputs in array equality checks

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the arraysEqual function in the AutocompleteSelect.svelte component. The changes enhance the function's flexibility by broadening its input type acceptance and introducing a normalization process. The new implementation allows the function to handle various input types, including single strings, arrays, null, and undefined values, while maintaining the core functionality of comparing array equality.

Changes

File Change Summary
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte Updated arraysEqual function signature and implementation to support more input types with a new normalize helper function

Poem

🐰 Hopping through code with glee,
Arrays now dance more free!
Strings, nulls, and lists combine,
Equality's logic now divine!
A rabbit's logic, sharp and bright! 🔍


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nas-tabchiche nas-tabchiche changed the title Fix autocomplete arraysEqual fix: autocomplete arraysEqual Jan 27, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte (1)

Line range hint 76-95: LGTM! The implementation is robust and handles edge cases well.

The enhanced type signature and normalization logic make the function more flexible while maintaining type safety.

Consider these optional improvements:

  1. The function name could be more descriptive of its enhanced capabilities, e.g., areValuesEqual.
  2. The Set comparison could be simplified using Set operations.

Here's an alternative implementation using Set operations:

 function arraysEqual(
   arr1: string | (string | undefined)[] | null | undefined,
   arr2: string | (string | undefined)[] | null | undefined
 ): boolean {
   const normalize = (val: string | (string | undefined)[] | null | undefined) => {
     if (typeof val === 'string') return [val];
     return val ?? [];
   };

   const a1 = normalize(arr1);
   const a2 = normalize(arr2);

   if (a1.length !== a2.length) return false;

   const set1 = new Set(a1);
   const set2 = new Set(a2);
-  for (const value of set1) {
-    if (!set2.has(value)) return false;
-  }
-  return true;
+  return a1.length === a2.length && 
+         [...set1].every(value => set2.has(value));
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20b2c96 and 3c553eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
  • GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: migrations-check (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
  • GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
  • GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

@ab-smith ab-smith changed the title fix: autocomplete arraysEqual fix: autocomplete arraysEqual leading to loops Jan 27, 2025
@ab-smith ab-smith merged commit 8e2fd1f into main Jan 27, 2025
18 checks passed
@ab-smith ab-smith deleted the fix/autocomplete-arrays-equal branch January 27, 2025 12:49
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 27, 2025
@ab-smith ab-smith added the perf label Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants