Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DeclareMissings is not a real Imputor #87

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2020

Conversation

rofinn
Copy link
Member

@rofinn rofinn commented Oct 19, 2020

  1. It often won't return the input data type if the input data doesn't allowmissings.
  2. The API is sufficiently different in that it doesn't really apply across dimensions like the other imputors.
  3. It's actively making more missings rather than estimating realistic values which puts it closer to the Filter method than a a real imputor.

Closes #77

1. It often won't return the input data type if the input data doesn't allowmissings.
2. The API is sufficiently different in that it doesn't really apply across dimensions like the other imputors.
3. It's actively making more `missing`s rather than estimating realistic values which puts it closer to the Filter method than a a real imputor.
@rofinn
Copy link
Member Author

rofinn commented Oct 20, 2020

If there aren't any objections to this I'll probably just merge it in a day or so.

@rofinn rofinn merged commit 3ef5852 into master Nov 2, 2020
@rofinn rofinn deleted the rf/declaremissings-not-imputor branch November 2, 2020 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should Standardize actually be an Imputor
1 participant