Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenFastTrace tracing report of openfasttrace tracing itself in github CI? #246

Closed
froh opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #333
Closed

OpenFastTrace tracing report of openfasttrace tracing itself in github CI? #246

froh opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #333

Comments

@froh
Copy link

froh commented Jun 15, 2020

As a potential OpenFastTrace user
I want to be amazed by the tracing reports of OpenFastTrace itself life based off the CI
in order to see how OpenFastTrace shows the maturity of software.

OpenFastTrace proper is a project of a reasonable size and it would be great to see the tool at work on itself, life on the web, from the github CI.

@froh froh changed the title OpenFastTrace tracing report in github CI? OpenFastTrace tracing report of openfasttrace tracing itself in github CI? Dec 8, 2020
kaklakariada added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2022
kaklakariada added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2022
@froh
Copy link
Author

froh commented Aug 17, 2022

noice :-)

found such a report: https://github.com/itsallcode/openfasttrace/actions/runs/2856155773

alas the paths are not relative yet, or "rebased" to the original github locations.

example path (to show what I mean)

/home/runner/work/openfasttrace/openfasttrace/core/src/main/java/org/itsallcode/openfasttrace/core/cli/CliArguments.java :25

instead of
https://github.com/itsallcode/openfasttrace/tree/17a207de58166633bf36c8606bd5dc74d882ff37 ... #L25

note also the difference in the line number.

A clever solution might be some parameter similar to --prefix and a simple template like a --something-format, which will get some flavour of $prefix, $fullname, $lineno, as arguments. by default, $prefix is the absolute prefix on the filesystem.

Then console output gets just the default format, "$prefix$fullname:$lineno" (in the appropriate syntax, of course) and the github actions web report has --prefix="https..../$sha-hash/" and -something-format="$prefix$fullname#L$lineno"

but hey this is huge already :-) <3

kaklakariada added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2023
* #342: Restructure changelog

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Christoph Pirkl <[email protected]>

* #342: Restructure changelog

* #342: Updated versions.

* #359: Improve logo transparency

* #359: Updated version number and changelog.

* #356: Fix warning in codeql-analysis.yml

* Upgrade test dependencies

* #246: Avoid configuring mocks as lenient

* Fix warning under Java 17

OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Ignoring option --illegal-access=deny; support was removed in 17.0

* Test with Java 19

* Fix integration test

* Fix compiler warnings

* Skip tests that require the SecurityManager

Java 19ff does not support the SecurityManager any more.

* Update release date

---------

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bär <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kaklakariada <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kaklakariada <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant