feat: support open more entries in update-taro-entry #2848
Conversation
Walkthrough此拉取请求修改了 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat_v3.x #2848 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 84.14% 84.14%
==========================================
Files 273 273
Lines 18103 18103
Branches 2690 2690
==========================================
Hits 15232 15232
Misses 2866 2866
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js (2)
Line range hint
41-49: 建议添加调试日志在组件筛选过程中，建议添加调试日志以便于问题排查。特别是在处理多个组件时，这将有助于追踪组件的解析和过滤过程。
建议添加以下改进：
item.packages.map((it) => { if (!(it.exportEmpty == false) && it.show && it.taro) { if (!param || specialComponent(it.name)) { + console.log(`添加组件到配置：${it.name}`); co.pages.push(`pages/${it.name.toLowerCase()}/index`) + } else { + console.log(`跳过组件：${it.name}`); } } })
Line range hint
1-124: 架构优化建议代码中存在以下可以改进的架构问题：
- 文件系统操作混合使用了同步和异步方法，建议统一使用异步方法以提高性能
- 错误处理机制不够完善，建议添加统一的错误处理层
- 配置处理逻辑可以抽离为独立的模块
建议考虑以下改进方向：
- 将文件系统操作统一改为异步方式
- 添加统一的错误处理机制
- 将配置处理逻辑抽离为独立模块
- 添加日志记录机制
如果您需要具体的实现建议，我可以提供更详细的代码示例。
| // C=radio pnpm dev:taro:jdharmonycpp or C=radio,button,cell pnpm dev:taro:jdharmonycpp | ||
| function specialComponent(name) { | ||
| return param && name.toLowerCase() == param.toLowerCase() | ||
| const entries = param.split(',').map((i) => i.toLowerCase()) | ||
| return entries.includes(name.toLowerCase()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
建议添加输入验证逻辑
specialComponent 函数在处理 param 时缺少必要的输入验证。当 param 为 undefined、null 或空字符串时，split 操作可能会导致错误。
建议添加以下改进：
function specialComponent(name) {
+ if (!param) return false;
const entries = param.split(',').map((i) => i.toLowerCase())
return entries.includes(name.toLowerCase())
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤔 这个变动的性质是？
🔗 相关 Issue
💡 需求背景和解决方案
☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单
Summary by CodeRabbit