Retire http://jmock.org/

[tobyweston]

http://jmock.org/ seems really out of date and a bit misleading.

Shall we retire it and favour the Github docs? Otherwise, it could prob use a freshen up.

[olibye]

I've raised this before. I agree. We also need to upgrade to junit5

…

On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, 14:30 Toby, ***@***.***> wrote: http://jmock.org/ seems really out of date and a bit misleading. Shall we retire it and favour the Github docs? Otherwise, it could prob use a freshen up. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#110>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQK0FTyfNONMgyBcSk2bpZQdxkrGCvgks5uXoB7gaJpZM4WY_dV> .

[olibye]

Could somebody explain how I edit the github pages to point to new releases?

[olibye]

I've figured this out and pointed jmock.org at 2.9.0.
I may back populate the other releases.
I might try copying some pages into the wiki. That could make them easier to update for everybody?

[sf105]

Suggest considering moving docs to /docs directory. GH can publish from there.

[olibye]

Agreed, /doc approach is better than switching branches. I note somebody just did this for Hamcrest.

…

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 11:05, Steve Freeman ***@***.***> wrote: Suggest considering moving docs to /docs directory. GH can publish from there. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#110 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQK0KLrZZt5jKoaxrNpBvDSylKqBYgeks5uqDJrgaJpZM4WY_dV> .

[olibye]

Updated the site to announce jMock 2.10.0-RC3 which supports JDK11.
I've realised I have do some sort of build to change the side bar on all pages.

[dpeger]

Searching for jmock on google leads to http://jmock.org/download.html which still mentions 2.6.1 (this release doesn't even exist) as latest release.