Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature wishlists #2

Closed
9 of 12 tasks
jonschlinkert opened this issue Sep 1, 2014 · 29 comments
Closed
9 of 12 tasks

feature wishlists #2

jonschlinkert opened this issue Sep 1, 2014 · 29 comments

Comments

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner

from jonschlinkert/remarked#12 (comment)


upd by @puzrin:

No questions! No discussions! Only feature name + link to details. This issue is used by devs to keep archtecture in sync with possible needs. If you wish to discuss any feature - just create new a ticket.

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Sep 1, 2014

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Sep 9, 2014

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Sep 11, 2014

  • table of content (toc)

@howardroark
Copy link

Would it make sense to make a ticket for each feature request with a proper label and make this ticket a milestone? Or at least add a link next to each "todo"?

I'd love to talk about things like Footnotes (which I feel is an excellent idea).

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Sep 11, 2014

This thread is to understand the situation in general, and check, that all features can be implemented with new archtecture. Please, don't make discusstions here. Only name of feature + link to details if exists.

If you need to discuss feature details - just create a separate issue.

@howardroark
Copy link

Jekyll has a great thing called front-matter which makes it a sane process to use Markdown files as the structure of a document. It's basically a format for adding data that is meant for a template engine that runs later. It could be a project of it's own, but the idea of returning content+meta in one swoop is very interesting.

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Sep 11, 2014

(?) From multimarkdown https://rawgit.com/fletcher/human-markdown-reference/master/index.html

  • citations
  • definition lists

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

@puzrin I'm going to consolidate the ideas in the op, obviously feel free to continue editing that list

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Sep 11, 2014

ok

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Sep 17, 2014

Marked two html-related features for remove. First one because working on/off mode for html, second - because not needed (with html off output is correct, with html on need external sanitizer).

@jonschlinkert , if no objections - cleanup first message

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

done

@szelga
Copy link

szelga commented Oct 30, 2014

image dimensions: http://stackoverflow.com/a/21242579

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

huh, yeah image dimensions is an interesting one. I like that

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Oct 30, 2014

There are maruku syntax for defining any attributes. I'm not sure, that it's good idea to make exclusion specially for images.

I'd recommend to discuss it first at http://talk.commonmark.org/ , if you wish to include it to core. Or you can rewrite image rendering fn and extract this info from title, if you can't wait.

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

yeah, I was thinking it would be interesting for a plugin or extension, not core

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

maybe we should create an issue titled "plugin ideas" where we can add these, so we/users can add to those or create the plugins. also might be a good way to educate users on what is good for core versus a plugin - by way of example...

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Oct 30, 2014

Create a memo page in wiki, to avoid infinite tickets.

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

so, create a page in the wiki, where no one looks, to avoid users creating more tickets? (e.g. users will create tickets and we'll tell them to look at the wiki? instead of having one ticket that keeps users from creating more?). not sure that makes sense

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Oct 30, 2014

You try to create ticket for solving problem that not yet happened :)

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Nov 8, 2014

Removed toc - in 1.4.0 can be done with plugin easy. The same for Emojy.

@jonschlinkert were can i see detailed examples for citations ?

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

I'll look around for examples. I can't remember where I saw them.

@tcoopman
Copy link

metadata?

Metadata must be placed at the top of the document – there can be no white-spaces before – and it ends with the first empty line. Each entry is composed of key and values, separated by a colon (:).

There are plenty of keys supported, some of the most common being Title, Author, Date, Copyright, Keywords and Email.

http://bywordapp.com/markdown/guide.html

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Nov 18, 2014

metadata?

It's not in CommonMark spec. Only discussed, with unclear future http://talk.commonmark.org/t/metadata-in-documents/721

It's better to parse metadata in external module now or write appropriate plugin.

@tcoopman
Copy link

It's better to parse metadata in external module now or write appropriate plugin.

I have written a plugin a the moment. Except for the fact that there aren't any docs yet, it was nice and easy. Nice work on remarkable (I will use it on my blog)

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Nov 26, 2014

@jonschlinkert i think, we can close this ticket and create separate issues for rules, that are really needed. No need to keep infinite issues, which have no strict conditions to close.

@puzrin
Copy link
Contributor

puzrin commented Nov 29, 2014

Closed. Create separate tickets or just write plugins. The most complicated things are already done.

@puzrin puzrin closed this as completed Nov 29, 2014
@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Owner Author

Sorry, when I read the email from the last message on here I thought you closed this already. 👍

@anaran
Copy link

anaran commented Jan 19, 2015

github task list support is not implemented yet, right?

It's kind of hard to follow the situation about them.

@felixSchl
Copy link

Yeah what's the story about githab task lists, is this still on the radar?

GerHobbelt pushed a commit to GerHobbelt/remarkable that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2016
Fixed partial output due to exit before async write to stdout complet…
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants